PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JHMD vs. EIS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JHMD vs. EIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF (JHMD) and iShares MSCI Israel ETF (EIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHMD achieves a 7.87% return, which is significantly lower than EIS's 18.19% return.


JHMD

1D
-0.51%
1M
2.80%
YTD
7.87%
6M
10.87%
1Y
21.60%
3Y*
16.74%
5Y*
8.47%
10Y*

EIS

1D
-1.92%
1M
-2.12%
YTD
18.19%
6M
22.47%
1Y
54.91%
3Y*
37.61%
5Y*
15.32%
10Y*
11.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHMD vs. EIS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JHMD
John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF
7.87%33.91%1.78%19.43%-13.95%11.83%7.25%19.83%-14.54%25.02%
EIS
iShares MSCI Israel ETF
18.19%45.11%34.50%5.48%-27.05%22.83%12.01%20.93%-4.84%12.77%

Correlation

The correlation between JHMD and EIS is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2016

0.60

The correlation between JHMD and EIS shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

JHMD vs. EIS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JHMD
EIS

Financial Services

24.8%
34.6%

Industrials

19.9%
10.9%

Healthcare

8.9%
9.8%

Basic Materials

7.8%
1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

7.6%
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

7.4%
2.3%

Technology

7.0%
17.8%

Utilities

5.7%
6.6%

Communication Services

5.3%
2.7%

Energy

4.0%
2.0%

Real Estate

1.6%
9.1%

Financial Services

JHMD
24.8%
EIS
34.6%

Industrials

JHMD
19.9%
EIS
10.9%

Healthcare

JHMD
8.9%
EIS
9.8%

Basic Materials

JHMD
7.8%
EIS
1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

JHMD
7.6%
EIS
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

JHMD
7.4%
EIS
2.3%

Technology

JHMD
7.0%
EIS
17.8%

Utilities

JHMD
5.7%
EIS
6.6%

Communication Services

JHMD
5.3%
EIS
2.7%

Energy

JHMD
4.0%
EIS
2.0%

Real Estate

JHMD
1.6%
EIS
9.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JHMD vs. EIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHMD
JHMD Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
JHMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHMD Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
JHMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHMD Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

EIS
EIS Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
EIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIS Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
EIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIS Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHMD vs. EIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF (JHMD) and iShares MSCI Israel ETF (EIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JHMDEISDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.42

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

4.45

-2.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.21

16.54

-9.34

JHMD vs. EIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHMD Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is lower than the EIS Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHMD and EIS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JHMDEISDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48

2.45

-0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.71

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.33

+0.22

Drawdowns

JHMD vs. EIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHMD drawdown since its inception was -35.67%, smaller than the maximum EIS drawdown of -51.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHMD and EIS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JHMDEISDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.67%

-51.94%

+16.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.23%

-12.40%

+1.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.38%

-24.10%

+10.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.38%

-41.88%

+12.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.48%

-5.56%

+3.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.73%

-13.90%

+7.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

3.33%

-0.33%

Volatility

JHMD vs. EIS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF (JHMD) is 4.89%, while iShares MSCI Israel ETF (EIS) has a volatility of 6.64%. This indicates that JHMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JHMDEISDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.89%

6.64%

-1.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.05%

16.05%

-4.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.66%

22.56%

-7.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.26%

21.81%

-5.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.20%

21.08%

-3.88%

JHMD vs. EIS - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHMD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than EIS's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

JHMD vs. EIS - Dividend Comparison

JHMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, more than EIS's 1.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EIS
iShares MSCI Israel ETF
1.22%1.44%1.38%1.39%1.66%1.04%0.16%2.06%0.87%2.02%1.78%2.55%
JHMD
John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF
2.96%3.19%3.55%3.01%2.85%3.22%1.89%3.19%2.09%2.27%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JHMD and EIS have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EIS has higher volatility (6.64%) compared to JHMD (4.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHMD dropped -35.67% vs EIS's -51.94%.

On 5-year performance, EIS leads with 15.32% vs 8.47% for JHMD. On fees, JHMD is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, JHMD has been the lower-risk option at 4.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EIS has performed better with a 15.32% return vs 8.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JHMD is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EIS.

JHMD has the higher dividend yield at 2.96%, compared with 1.22% for EIS.

JHMD tracks John Hancock Dimensional Developed International Index, while EIS tracks MSCI Israel Capped Investable Market Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: Manulife and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for JHMD and 0.59% for EIS.

EIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JHMD and EIS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer