JHMD vs. EIS
JHMD (John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF) and EIS (iShares MSCI Israel ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - JHMD tracks the John Hancock Dimensional Developed International Index while EIS tracks the MSCI Israel Capped Investable Market Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JHMD returned 8.47%/yr vs 15.32%/yr for EIS. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JHMD charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for EIS.
Performance
JHMD vs. EIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JHMD achieves a 7.87% return, which is significantly lower than EIS's 18.19% return.
JHMD
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 2.80%
- YTD
- 7.87%
- 6M
- 10.87%
- 1Y
- 21.60%
- 3Y*
- 16.74%
- 5Y*
- 8.47%
- 10Y*
- —
EIS
- 1D
- -1.92%
- 1M
- -2.12%
- YTD
- 18.19%
- 6M
- 22.47%
- 1Y
- 54.91%
- 3Y*
- 37.61%
- 5Y*
- 15.32%
- 10Y*
- 11.97%
JHMD vs. EIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHMD John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF | 7.87% | 33.91% | 1.78% | 19.43% | -13.95% | 11.83% | 7.25% | 19.83% | -14.54% | 25.02% |
EIS iShares MSCI Israel ETF | 18.19% | 45.11% | 34.50% | 5.48% | -27.05% | 22.83% | 12.01% | 20.93% | -4.84% | 12.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between JHMD and EIS is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2016 | 0.60 |
The correlation between JHMD and EIS shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
JHMD vs. EIS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JHMD
EIS
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Utilities
Communication Services
Energy
Real Estate
Financial Services
JHMD
EIS
Industrials
JHMD
EIS
Healthcare
JHMD
EIS
Basic Materials
JHMD
EIS
Consumer Cyclical
JHMD
EIS
Consumer Defensive
JHMD
EIS
Technology
JHMD
EIS
Utilities
JHMD
EIS
Communication Services
JHMD
EIS
Energy
JHMD
EIS
Real Estate
JHMD
EIS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JHMD vs. EIS — Risk / Return Rank
JHMD
EIS
JHMD vs. EIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF (JHMD) and iShares MSCI Israel ETF (EIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JHMD | EIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.42 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.93 | 4.45 | -2.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.21 | 16.54 | -9.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JHMD | EIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.48 | 2.45 | -0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.71 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.33 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
JHMD vs. EIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JHMD drawdown since its inception was -35.67%, smaller than the maximum EIS drawdown of -51.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHMD and EIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JHMD | EIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.67% | -51.94% | +16.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.23% | -12.40% | +1.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.38% | -24.10% | +10.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.38% | -41.88% | +12.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.48% | -5.56% | +3.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.73% | -13.90% | +7.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.00% | 3.33% | -0.33% |
Volatility
JHMD vs. EIS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF (JHMD) is 4.89%, while iShares MSCI Israel ETF (EIS) has a volatility of 6.64%. This indicates that JHMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JHMD | EIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.89% | 6.64% | -1.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.05% | 16.05% | -4.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.66% | 22.56% | -7.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.26% | 21.81% | -5.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.20% | 21.08% | -3.88% |
JHMD vs. EIS - Expense Ratio Comparison
JHMD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than EIS's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
JHMD vs. EIS - Dividend Comparison
JHMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, more than EIS's 1.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIS iShares MSCI Israel ETF | 1.22% | 1.44% | 1.38% | 1.39% | 1.66% | 1.04% | 0.16% | 2.06% | 0.87% | 2.02% | 1.78% | 2.55% |
JHMD John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF | 2.96% | 3.19% | 3.55% | 3.01% | 2.85% | 3.22% | 1.89% | 3.19% | 2.09% | 2.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JHMD and EIS have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EIS has higher volatility (6.64%) compared to JHMD (4.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHMD dropped -35.67% vs EIS's -51.94%.
On 5-year performance, EIS leads with 15.32% vs 8.47% for JHMD. On fees, JHMD is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, JHMD has been the lower-risk option at 4.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EIS has performed better with a 15.32% return vs 8.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JHMD is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EIS.
JHMD has the higher dividend yield at 2.96%, compared with 1.22% for EIS.
JHMD tracks John Hancock Dimensional Developed International Index, while EIS tracks MSCI Israel Capped Investable Market Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: Manulife and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for JHMD and 0.59% for EIS.
EIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JHMD and EIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer