EIS vs. EPU
EIS (iShares MSCI Israel ETF) and EPU (iShares MSCI Peru ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EIS is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI Israel Capped Investable Market Index (Net), while EPU is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Peru Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EIS returned 11.97%/yr vs 14.20%/yr for EPU. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.59% expense ratio.
Performance
EIS vs. EPU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EIS achieves a 18.19% return, which is significantly higher than EPU's 16.05% return. Over the past 10 years, EIS has underperformed EPU with an annualized return of 11.97%, while EPU has yielded a comparatively higher 14.20% annualized return.
EIS
- 1D
- -1.92%
- 1M
- -2.12%
- YTD
- 18.19%
- 6M
- 22.47%
- 1Y
- 54.91%
- 3Y*
- 37.61%
- 5Y*
- 15.32%
- 10Y*
- 11.97%
EPU
- 1D
- -2.58%
- 1M
- 7.83%
- YTD
- 16.05%
- 6M
- 27.68%
- 1Y
- 79.15%
- 3Y*
- 45.81%
- 5Y*
- 24.36%
- 10Y*
- 14.20%
EIS vs. EPU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIS iShares MSCI Israel ETF | 18.19% | 45.11% | 34.50% | 5.48% | -27.05% | 22.83% | 12.01% | 20.93% | -4.84% | 12.77% |
EPU iShares MSCI Peru ETF | 16.05% | 86.87% | 21.73% | 25.34% | 2.05% | -11.81% | -4.31% | 7.30% | -12.17% | 29.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between EIS and EPU is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2009 | 0.43 |
EIS vs. EPU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EIS
EPU
Financial Services
Technology
-
Industrials
Healthcare
Real Estate
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Basic Materials
Financial Services
EIS
EPU
Technology
EIS
EPU
-
Industrials
EIS
EPU
Healthcare
EIS
EPU
Real Estate
EIS
EPU
Utilities
EIS
EPU
Communication Services
EIS
EPU
Consumer Cyclical
EIS
EPU
Consumer Defensive
EIS
EPU
Energy
EIS
EPU
-
Basic Materials
EIS
EPU
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EIS vs. EPU — Risk / Return Rank
EIS
EPU
EIS vs. EPU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Israel ETF (EIS) and iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EIS | EPU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.45 | 2.71 | -0.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.36 | 3.13 | +0.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.43 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.45 | 3.82 | +0.64 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.54 | 11.49 | +5.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EIS | EPU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.45 | 2.71 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.98 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.61 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.45 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
EIS vs. EPU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EIS drawdown since its inception was -51.94%, smaller than the maximum EPU drawdown of -60.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIS and EPU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EIS | EPU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.94% | -60.62% | +8.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.40% | -20.85% | +8.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.10% | -20.85% | -3.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.88% | -35.59% | -6.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.88% | -50.97% | +9.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.56% | -10.53% | +4.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.90% | -18.83% | +4.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.33% | 6.91% | -3.58% |
Volatility
EIS vs. EPU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Israel ETF (EIS) is 6.64%, while iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU) has a volatility of 9.48%. This indicates that EIS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EPU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EIS | EPU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.64% | 9.48% | -2.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.05% | 25.04% | -8.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.56% | 29.32% | -6.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.81% | 25.12% | -3.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.08% | 23.43% | -2.35% |
EIS vs. EPU - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EIS and EPU have an expense ratio of 0.59%.
Dividends
EIS vs. EPU - Dividend Comparison
EIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, less than EPU's 1.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIS iShares MSCI Israel ETF | 1.22% | 1.44% | 1.38% | 1.39% | 1.66% | 1.04% | 0.16% | 2.06% | 0.87% | 2.02% | 1.78% | 2.55% |
EPU iShares MSCI Peru ETF | 1.41% | 1.63% | 5.78% | 4.17% | 5.56% | 3.13% | 1.91% | 2.67% | 1.53% | 3.30% | 0.85% | 1.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EIS and EPU have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EPU has higher volatility (9.48%) compared to EIS (6.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIS dropped -51.94% vs EPU's -60.62%.
On 10-year performance, EPU leads with 14.20% vs 11.97% for EIS. Both ETFs have the same 0.59% expense ratio. On volatility, EIS has been the lower-risk option at 6.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EPU has performed better with a 14.20% return vs 11.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EIS and EPU have the same expense ratio: 0.59% per year.
EPU has the higher dividend yield at 1.41%, compared with 1.22% for EIS.
EIS is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while EPU is Mid Cap Blend Equities. EIS tracks MSCI Israel Capped Investable Market Index (Net), while EPU tracks MSCI All Peru Capped Index.
EPU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EIS and EPU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer