PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EIS vs. ITEQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EIS vs. ITEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Israel ETF (EIS) and BlueStar Israel Technology ETF (ITEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIS achieves a 9.12% return, which is significantly higher than ITEQ's 7.51% return. Over the past 10 years, EIS has outperformed ITEQ with an annualized return of 10.90%, while ITEQ has yielded a comparatively lower 9.68% annualized return.


EIS

1D
0.23%
1M
-0.94%
6M
0.90%
YTD
9.12%
1Y
33.25%
3Y*
29.33%
5Y*
12.72%
10Y*
10.90%
ALL TIME*
6.85%

ITEQ

1D
0.66%
1M
-5.78%
6M
2.26%
YTD
7.51%
1Y
17.90%
3Y*
9.46%
5Y*
-1.90%
10Y*
9.68%
ALL TIME*
8.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$7.58M$8.69M$11.04M
$217.34K$197.61K$295.84K

EIS vs. ITEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EIS
iShares MSCI Israel ETF
9.12%45.11%34.50%5.48%-27.05%22.83%12.01%20.93%-4.84%12.77%
ITEQ
BlueStar Israel Technology ETF
7.51%13.71%11.70%4.70%-30.36%-8.04%58.96%37.59%-0.63%26.87%

Correlation

The correlation between EIS and ITEQ is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2015

0.74

The correlation between EIS and ITEQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

EIS vs. ITEQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EIS
ITEQ

Financial Services

34.4%
5.1%

Technology

18.7%
64.1%

Industrials

10.9%
11.2%

Healthcare

9.4%
4.4%

Real Estate

8.4%

-

Utilities

6.7%
9.1%

Communication Services

2.5%
2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

2.5%
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

2.3%

-

Energy

2.0%
1.4%

Basic Materials

1.6%

-

Financial Services

EIS
34.4%
ITEQ
5.1%

Technology

EIS
18.7%
ITEQ
64.1%

Industrials

EIS
10.9%
ITEQ
11.2%

Healthcare

EIS
9.4%
ITEQ
4.4%

Real Estate

EIS
8.4%
ITEQ

-

Utilities

EIS
6.7%
ITEQ
9.1%

Communication Services

EIS
2.5%
ITEQ
2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

EIS
2.5%
ITEQ
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

EIS
2.3%
ITEQ

-

Energy

EIS
2.0%
ITEQ
1.4%

Basic Materials

EIS
1.6%
ITEQ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EIS vs. ITEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EIS
EIS Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
EIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIS Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
EIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIS Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

ITEQ
ITEQ Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
ITEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
ITEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EIS vs. ITEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Israel ETF (EIS) and BlueStar Israel Technology ETF (ITEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EISITEQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.12

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

1.22

+0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.09

3.07

+3.02

EIS vs. ITEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIS Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is higher than the ITEQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIS and ITEQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EIS vs. ITEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIS drawdown since its inception was -51.94%, roughly equal to the maximum ITEQ drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIS and ITEQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EISITEQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.94%

-54.63%

+2.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.37%

-13.29%

-2.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.75%

-22.90%

+1.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.88%

-50.29%

+8.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.88%

-54.63%

+12.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.80%

-20.34%

+7.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.88%

-18.49%

+4.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.29%

5.29%

0.00%

Volatility

EIS vs. ITEQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Israel ETF (EIS) is 6.91%, while BlueStar Israel Technology ETF (ITEQ) has a volatility of 7.56%. This indicates that EIS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ITEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EISITEQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.91%

7.56%

-0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.77%

19.89%

-1.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.38%

24.56%

-1.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.33%

25.32%

-2.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.30%

23.55%

-2.25%

EIS vs. ITEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

EIS has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than ITEQ's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

EIS vs. ITEQ - Dividend Comparison

EIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, more than ITEQ's 0.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EIS
iShares MSCI Israel ETF
1.56%1.44%1.38%1.39%1.66%1.04%0.16%2.06%0.87%2.02%1.78%2.55%
ITEQ
BlueStar Israel Technology ETF
0.79%0.85%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EIS and ITEQ have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ITEQ has higher volatility (7.56%) compared to EIS (6.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIS dropped -51.94% vs ITEQ's -54.63%.

On 10-year performance, EIS leads with 10.90% vs 9.68% for ITEQ. On fees, EIS is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, EIS has been the lower-risk option at 6.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EIS has performed better with a 10.90% return vs 9.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EIS is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ITEQ.

EIS has the higher dividend yield at 1.56%, compared with 0.79% for ITEQ.

EIS is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while ITEQ is Technology Equities. EIS tracks MSCI Israel Capped Investable Market Index (Net), while ITEQ tracks BlueStar Israel Global Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ETFMG. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EIS and 0.75% for ITEQ.

EIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EIS and ITEQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer