EIS vs. ITEQ
EIS (iShares MSCI Israel ETF) and ITEQ (BlueStar Israel Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EIS is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI Israel Capped Investable Market Index (Net), while ITEQ is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Israel Global Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EIS returned 11.97%/yr vs 11.00%/yr for ITEQ. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EIS charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ITEQ.
Performance
EIS vs. ITEQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EIS achieves a 18.19% return, which is significantly higher than ITEQ's 17.19% return. Over the past 10 years, EIS has outperformed ITEQ with an annualized return of 11.97%, while ITEQ has yielded a comparatively lower 11.00% annualized return.
EIS
- 1D
- -1.92%
- 1M
- -2.12%
- YTD
- 18.19%
- 6M
- 22.47%
- 1Y
- 54.91%
- 3Y*
- 37.61%
- 5Y*
- 15.32%
- 10Y*
- 11.97%
ITEQ
- 1D
- -2.89%
- 1M
- 7.48%
- YTD
- 17.19%
- 6M
- 20.44%
- 1Y
- 27.92%
- 3Y*
- 14.27%
- 5Y*
- 0.67%
- 10Y*
- 11.00%
EIS vs. ITEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIS iShares MSCI Israel ETF | 18.19% | 45.11% | 34.50% | 5.48% | -27.05% | 22.83% | 12.01% | 20.93% | -4.84% | 12.77% |
ITEQ BlueStar Israel Technology ETF | 17.19% | 13.71% | 11.70% | 4.70% | -30.36% | -8.04% | 58.96% | 37.59% | -0.63% | 26.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between EIS and ITEQ is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2015 | 0.74 |
The correlation between EIS and ITEQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
EIS vs. ITEQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EIS
ITEQ
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Real Estate
-
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
EIS
ITEQ
Technology
EIS
ITEQ
Industrials
EIS
ITEQ
Healthcare
EIS
ITEQ
Real Estate
EIS
ITEQ
-
Utilities
EIS
ITEQ
Communication Services
EIS
ITEQ
Consumer Cyclical
EIS
ITEQ
Consumer Defensive
EIS
ITEQ
-
Energy
EIS
ITEQ
Basic Materials
EIS
ITEQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EIS vs. ITEQ — Risk / Return Rank
EIS
ITEQ
EIS vs. ITEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Israel ETF (EIS) and BlueStar Israel Technology ETF (ITEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EIS | ITEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.21 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.45 | 2.15 | +2.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.54 | 5.76 | +10.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EIS | ITEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.45 | 1.23 | +1.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.03 | +0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.47 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.43 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
EIS vs. ITEQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EIS drawdown since its inception was -51.94%, roughly equal to the maximum ITEQ drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIS and ITEQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EIS | ITEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.94% | -54.63% | +2.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.40% | -13.07% | +0.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.10% | -26.78% | +2.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.88% | -50.29% | +8.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.88% | -54.63% | +12.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.56% | -13.17% | +7.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.90% | -18.52% | +4.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.33% | 4.86% | -1.53% |
Volatility
EIS vs. ITEQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Israel ETF (EIS) is 6.64%, while BlueStar Israel Technology ETF (ITEQ) has a volatility of 7.71%. This indicates that EIS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ITEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EIS | ITEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.64% | 7.71% | -1.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.05% | 17.33% | -1.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.56% | 22.77% | -0.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.81% | 24.96% | -3.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.08% | 23.40% | -2.32% |
EIS vs. ITEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
EIS has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than ITEQ's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
EIS vs. ITEQ - Dividend Comparison
EIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, more than ITEQ's 0.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIS iShares MSCI Israel ETF | 1.22% | 1.44% | 1.38% | 1.39% | 1.66% | 1.04% | 0.16% | 2.06% | 0.87% | 2.02% | 1.78% | 2.55% |
ITEQ BlueStar Israel Technology ETF | 0.72% | 0.85% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EIS and ITEQ have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ITEQ has higher volatility (7.71%) compared to EIS (6.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIS dropped -51.94% vs ITEQ's -54.63%.
On 10-year performance, EIS leads with 11.97% vs 11.00% for ITEQ. On fees, EIS is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, EIS has been the lower-risk option at 6.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EIS has performed better with a 11.97% return vs 11.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EIS is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ITEQ.
EIS has the higher dividend yield at 1.22%, compared with 0.72% for ITEQ.
EIS is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while ITEQ is Technology Equities. EIS tracks MSCI Israel Capped Investable Market Index (Net), while ITEQ tracks BlueStar Israel Global Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ETFMG. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EIS and 0.75% for ITEQ.
EIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EIS and ITEQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer