JHEM vs. JHMD
JHEM (John Hancock Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF) and JHMD (John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JHEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the John Hancock Dimensional Emerging Markets Index, while JHMD is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the John Hancock Dimensional Developed International Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JHEM returned 7.90%/yr vs 8.59%/yr for JHMD. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JHEM charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for JHMD.
Performance
JHEM vs. JHMD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JHEM achieves a 25.02% return, which is significantly higher than JHMD's 8.50% return.
JHEM
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 6.18%
- YTD
- 25.02%
- 6M
- 28.35%
- 1Y
- 49.16%
- 3Y*
- 22.10%
- 5Y*
- 7.90%
- 10Y*
- —
JHMD
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 1.88%
- YTD
- 8.50%
- 6M
- 11.35%
- 1Y
- 22.05%
- 3Y*
- 17.09%
- 5Y*
- 8.59%
- 10Y*
- —
JHEM vs. JHMD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHEM John Hancock Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF | 25.02% | 30.49% | 4.58% | 12.94% | -17.90% | 2.10% | 11.50% | 17.68% | -7.41% |
JHMD John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF | 8.50% | 33.91% | 1.78% | 19.43% | -13.95% | 11.83% | 7.25% | 19.83% | -12.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between JHEM and JHMD is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2018 | 0.75 |
The correlation between JHEM and JHMD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
JHEM vs. JHMD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JHEM
JHMD
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Industrials
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
JHEM
JHMD
Financial Services
JHEM
JHMD
Consumer Cyclical
JHEM
JHMD
Basic Materials
JHEM
JHMD
Industrials
JHEM
JHMD
Communication Services
JHEM
JHMD
Energy
JHEM
JHMD
Consumer Defensive
JHEM
JHMD
Healthcare
JHEM
JHMD
Utilities
JHEM
JHMD
Real Estate
JHEM
JHMD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JHEM vs. JHMD — Risk / Return Rank
JHEM
JHMD
JHEM vs. JHMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (JHEM) and John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF (JHMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JHEM | JHMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.27 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.00 | 1.97 | +2.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.52 | 7.35 | +8.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JHEM | JHMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.64 | 1.51 | +1.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.53 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.55 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
JHEM vs. JHMD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JHEM drawdown since its inception was -34.99%, roughly equal to the maximum JHMD drawdown of -35.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHEM and JHMD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JHEM | JHMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.99% | -35.67% | +0.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.34% | -11.23% | -1.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.16% | -13.38% | -4.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.11% | -29.38% | -2.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.93% | -1.92% | -0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.94% | -6.73% | -3.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.18% | 3.01% | +0.17% |
Volatility
JHEM vs. JHMD - Volatility Comparison
John Hancock Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (JHEM) has a higher volatility of 7.95% compared to John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF (JHMD) at 4.71%. This indicates that JHEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JHMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JHEM | JHMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.95% | 4.71% | +3.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.27% | 12.05% | +4.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.71% | 14.63% | +4.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.61% | 16.26% | +1.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.60% | 17.19% | +3.41% |
JHEM vs. JHMD - Expense Ratio Comparison
JHEM has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than JHMD's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
JHEM vs. JHMD - Dividend Comparison
JHEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, less than JHMD's 2.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHEM John Hancock Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF | 1.91% | 2.39% | 2.93% | 2.87% | 2.84% | 2.71% | 1.67% | 2.37% | 0.21% | 0.00% |
JHMD John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF | 2.94% | 3.19% | 3.55% | 3.01% | 2.85% | 3.22% | 1.89% | 3.19% | 2.09% | 2.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JHEM and JHMD have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JHEM has higher volatility (7.95%) compared to JHMD (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHEM dropped -34.99% vs JHMD's -35.67%.
On 5-year performance, JHMD leads with 8.59% vs 7.90% for JHEM. On fees, JHMD is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, JHMD has been the lower-risk option at 4.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JHMD has performed better with a 8.59% return vs 7.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JHMD is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for JHEM.
JHMD has the higher dividend yield at 2.94%, compared with 1.91% for JHEM.
JHEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while JHMD is Foreign Large Cap Equities. JHEM tracks John Hancock Dimensional Emerging Markets Index, while JHMD tracks John Hancock Dimensional Developed International Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for JHEM and 0.39% for JHMD.
JHEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JHEM and JHMD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer