PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IYT vs. MOTO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IYT vs. MOTO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Transportation Average ETF (IYT) and SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYT achieves a 13.12% return, which is significantly lower than MOTO's 31.35% return.


IYT

1D
-1.00%
1M
3.94%
YTD
13.12%
6M
15.04%
1Y
30.40%
3Y*
14.77%
5Y*
5.55%
10Y*
10.51%

MOTO

1D
2.46%
1M
6.90%
YTD
31.35%
6M
32.65%
1Y
60.15%
3Y*
21.16%
5Y*
10.81%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IYT vs. MOTO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IYT
iShares Transportation Average ETF
13.12%11.48%4.10%24.62%-21.74%26.41%14.20%0.39%
MOTO
SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF
31.35%27.38%2.01%27.10%-27.20%17.22%59.13%4.91%

Correlation

The correlation between IYT and MOTO is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2019

0.69

The correlation between IYT and MOTO shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.69 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IYT vs. MOTO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IYT
MOTO

Industrials

83.3%
12.8%

Technology

16.7%
45.6%

Basic Materials

-

3.8%

Communication Services

-

4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

-

23.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.3%

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

1.0%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

0.7%

Industrials

IYT
83.3%
MOTO
12.8%

Technology

IYT
16.7%
MOTO
45.6%

Basic Materials

IYT

-

MOTO
3.8%

Communication Services

IYT

-

MOTO
4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

IYT

-

MOTO
23.5%

Consumer Defensive

IYT

-

MOTO
2.3%

Energy

IYT

-

MOTO

-

Financial Services

IYT

-

MOTO
1.0%

Healthcare

IYT

-

MOTO

-

Real Estate

IYT

-

MOTO

-

Utilities

IYT

-

MOTO
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IYT vs. MOTO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IYT
IYT Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
IYT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYT Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
IYT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYT Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

MOTO
MOTO Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
MOTO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOTO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOTO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
MOTO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOTO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IYT vs. MOTO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Transportation Average ETF (IYT) and SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IYTMOTODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.51

2.85

-1.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.15

3.68

-1.53

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.47

-0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.47

4.47

-2.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.00

16.00

-8.00

IYT vs. MOTO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYT Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is lower than the MOTO Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYT and MOTO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IYTMOTODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

2.85

-1.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.46

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.72

-0.30

Drawdowns

IYT vs. MOTO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYT drawdown since its inception was -60.39%, which is greater than MOTO's maximum drawdown of -38.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYT and MOTO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IYTMOTODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.39%

-38.24%

-22.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.09%

-13.36%

+1.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.35%

-26.43%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.15%

-37.34%

+8.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.00%

0.00%

-1.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.32%

-9.98%

+0.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.73%

3.73%

0.00%

Volatility

IYT vs. MOTO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Transportation Average ETF (IYT) is 7.34%, while SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO) has a volatility of 7.77%. This indicates that IYT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MOTO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IYTMOTODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.34%

7.77%

-0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.43%

16.75%

-1.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.17%

21.18%

-1.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.29%

23.62%

-1.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.15%

26.30%

-3.15%

IYT vs. MOTO - Expense Ratio Comparison

IYT has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than MOTO's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

IYT vs. MOTO - Dividend Comparison

IYT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, more than MOTO's 0.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IYT
iShares Transportation Average ETF
0.95%1.00%1.08%1.26%1.40%0.77%0.93%1.29%1.35%0.92%0.96%1.28%
MOTO
SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF
0.80%1.06%1.07%2.73%2.33%0.55%2.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IYT and MOTO have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MOTO has higher volatility (7.77%) compared to IYT (7.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYT dropped -60.39% vs MOTO's -38.24%.

On 5-year performance, MOTO leads with 10.81% vs 5.55% for IYT. On fees, IYT is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, IYT has been the lower-risk option at 7.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MOTO has performed better with a 10.81% return vs 5.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IYT is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for MOTO.

IYT has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.80% for MOTO.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Guinness Atkinson Asset Management. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for IYT and 0.68% for MOTO.

MOTO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IYT and MOTO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer