PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
IWN vs. VYM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between IWN and VYM is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.8

Performance

IWN vs. VYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-2.36%
4.70%
IWN
VYM

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

IWN:

0.54

VYM:

1.69

Sortino Ratio

IWN:

0.91

VYM:

2.39

Omega Ratio

IWN:

1.11

VYM:

1.31

Calmar Ratio

IWN:

0.82

VYM:

3.10

Martin Ratio

IWN:

2.62

VYM:

8.99

Ulcer Index

IWN:

4.29%

VYM:

2.06%

Daily Std Dev

IWN:

20.78%

VYM:

10.98%

Max Drawdown

IWN:

-61.55%

VYM:

-56.98%

Current Drawdown

IWN:

-9.56%

VYM:

-4.06%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWN achieves a -0.58% return, which is significantly lower than VYM's 0.54% return. Over the past 10 years, IWN has underperformed VYM with an annualized return of 7.20%, while VYM has yielded a comparatively higher 9.99% annualized return.


IWN

YTD

-0.58%

1M

-5.85%

6M

-2.40%

1Y

11.33%

5Y*

6.82%

10Y*

7.20%

VYM

YTD

0.54%

1M

-1.98%

6M

5.07%

1Y

18.38%

5Y*

9.72%

10Y*

9.99%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IWN vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWN has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


IWN
iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF
Expense ratio chart for IWN: current value at 0.24% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.24%
Expense ratio chart for VYM: current value at 0.06% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.06%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

IWN vs. VYM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IWN is 3636
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IWN is 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IWN is 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IWN is 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IWN is 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IWN is 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

VYM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VYM is 7777
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VYM is 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VYM is 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VYM is 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VYM is 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VYM is 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

IWN vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for IWN, currently valued at 0.54, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.005.000.541.69
The chart of Sortino ratio for IWN, currently valued at 0.91, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.000.912.39
The chart of Omega ratio for IWN, currently valued at 1.11, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.111.31
The chart of Calmar ratio for IWN, currently valued at 0.82, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.823.10
The chart of Martin ratio for IWN, currently valued at 2.62, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.002.628.99
IWN
VYM

The current IWN Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the VYM Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWN and VYM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.503.003.50AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.54
1.69
IWN
VYM

Dividends

IWN vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison

IWN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, less than VYM's 2.72% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
IWN
iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF
1.81%1.80%2.04%2.12%1.48%1.60%1.92%1.99%1.78%1.74%2.15%1.88%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
2.72%2.74%3.12%3.01%2.76%3.18%3.03%3.40%2.80%2.91%3.22%2.78%

Drawdowns

IWN vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWN drawdown since its inception was -61.55%, which is greater than VYM's maximum drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWN and VYM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-9.56%
-4.06%
IWN
VYM

Volatility

IWN vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) has a higher volatility of 6.11% compared to Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) at 4.32%. This indicates that IWN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
6.11%
4.32%
IWN
VYM
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab