IWN vs. BAC
IWN (iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF) is Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Value Index, while BAC (Bank of America Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, IWN returned 10.58%/yr vs 18.19%/yr for BAC. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
IWN vs. BAC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWN achieves a 20.82% return, which is significantly higher than BAC's 3.72% return. Over the past 10 years, IWN has underperformed BAC with an annualized return of 10.58%, while BAC has yielded a comparatively higher 18.19% annualized return.
IWN
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- 6.00%
- YTD
- 20.82%
- 6M
- 17.48%
- 1Y
- 44.79%
- 3Y*
- 17.41%
- 5Y*
- 6.89%
- 10Y*
- 10.58%
BAC
- 1D
- 2.31%
- 1M
- 13.98%
- YTD
- 3.72%
- 6M
- 3.46%
- 1Y
- 30.78%
- 3Y*
- 27.43%
- 5Y*
- 8.79%
- 10Y*
- 18.19%
IWN vs. BAC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF | 20.82% | 12.40% | 7.63% | 14.56% | -14.77% | 27.96% | 4.66% | 22.01% | -13.01% | 7.69% |
BAC Bank of America Corporation | 3.72% | 28.04% | 33.85% | 4.83% | -23.82% | 49.61% | -11.63% | 46.19% | -15.00% | 35.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWN and BAC is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2000 | 0.64 |
The correlation between IWN and BAC shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.69 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWN vs. BAC — Risk / Return Rank
IWN
BAC
IWN vs. BAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) and Bank of America Corporation (BAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IWN | BAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.24 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.02 | 1.64 | +3.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.91 | 4.21 | +12.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IWN vs. BAC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWN drawdown since its inception was -61.55%, smaller than the maximum BAC drawdown of -93.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWN and BAC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWN | BAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.55% | -93.10% | +31.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.45% | -17.93% | +9.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.70% | -27.51% | +0.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.70% | -46.64% | +19.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.08% | -48.95% | +2.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.36% | +0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.15% | -28.30% | +18.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | 6.96% | -4.45% |
Volatility
IWN vs. BAC - Volatility Comparison
iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) has a higher volatility of 5.80% compared to Bank of America Corporation (BAC) at 5.49%. This indicates that IWN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWN | BAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.80% | 5.49% | +0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.25% | 16.57% | -4.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.09% | 21.62% | -3.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.47% | 26.89% | -5.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.41% | 30.68% | -7.27% |
Dividends
IWN vs. BAC - Dividend Comparison
IWN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, less than BAC's 2.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAC Bank of America Corporation | 2.72% | 1.96% | 2.28% | 2.73% | 2.60% | 1.75% | 2.38% | 1.87% | 2.19% | 1.32% | 1.13% | 1.19% |
IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF | 1.42% | 1.70% | 1.80% | 2.04% | 2.12% | 1.48% | 1.60% | 1.92% | 1.99% | 1.78% | 1.74% | 2.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWN and BAC have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IWN has higher volatility (5.80%) compared to BAC (5.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWN dropped -61.55% vs BAC's -93.10%.
IWN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWN and BAC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer