BAC vs. USB

In the year-to-date period, BAC achieves a -9.37% return, which is significantly higher than USB's -15.26% return. Over the past 10 years, BAC has outperformed USB with an annualized return of 12.17%, while USB has yielded a comparatively lower 2.93% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bank of America Corporation (BAC) and U.S. Bancorp (USB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current BAC Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is higher than the USB Sharpe Ratio of 0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAC and USB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

BAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, less than USB's 4.97% yield.

The maximum BAC drawdown since its inception was -93.45%, which is greater than USB's maximum drawdown of -76.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAC and USB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) has a higher volatility of 18.10% compared to U.S. Bancorp (USB) at 16.57%. This indicates that BAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bank of America Corporation and U.S. Bancorp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.