PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BAC vs. USB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


BACUSB
YTD Return10.69%-5.05%
1Y Return31.49%29.98%
3Y Return (Ann)-0.53%-8.00%
5Y Return (Ann)6.56%-1.31%
10Y Return (Ann)11.47%3.37%
Sharpe Ratio1.250.74
Daily Std Dev24.32%33.86%
Max Drawdown-93.45%-76.08%
Current Drawdown-20.36%-28.55%

Fundamentals


BACUSB
Market Cap$297.60B$64.15B
EPS$2.90$3.01
PE Ratio13.0413.66
PEG Ratio3.691.14
Revenue (TTM)$93.36B$25.16B
Gross Profit (TTM)$92.41B$22.14B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between BAC and USB is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

BAC vs. USB - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, BAC achieves a 10.69% return, which is significantly higher than USB's -5.05% return. Over the past 10 years, BAC has outperformed USB with an annualized return of 11.47%, while USB has yielded a comparatively lower 3.37% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


2,000.00%4,000.00%6,000.00%8,000.00%10,000.00%December2024FebruaryMarchApril
2,409.15%
9,821.86%
BAC
USB

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Bank of America Corporation

U.S. Bancorp

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BAC vs. USB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bank of America Corporation (BAC) and U.S. Bancorp (USB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BAC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BAC, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.001.25
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BAC, currently valued at 1.98, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.98
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BAC, currently valued at 1.23, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.23
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BAC, currently valued at 0.65, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.65
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BAC, currently valued at 3.68, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.003.68
USB
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for USB, currently valued at 0.74, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.000.74
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for USB, currently valued at 1.29, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.29
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for USB, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.15
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for USB, currently valued at 0.48, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.48
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for USB, currently valued at 2.71, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.002.71

BAC vs. USB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAC Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is higher than the USB Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of BAC and USB.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.50December2024FebruaryMarchApril
1.25
0.74
BAC
USB

Dividends

BAC vs. USB - Dividend Comparison

BAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, less than USB's 4.77% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
2.54%2.73%2.60%1.75%2.38%1.87%2.19%1.32%1.13%1.19%0.67%0.26%
USB
U.S. Bancorp
4.77%4.46%4.31%3.13%3.61%2.66%2.93%2.16%2.08%2.37%2.15%2.19%

Drawdowns

BAC vs. USB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAC drawdown since its inception was -93.45%, which is greater than USB's maximum drawdown of -76.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAC and USB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-45.00%-40.00%-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%December2024FebruaryMarchApril
-20.36%
-28.55%
BAC
USB

Volatility

BAC vs. USB - Volatility Comparison

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) and U.S. Bancorp (USB) have volatilities of 7.62% and 7.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%December2024FebruaryMarchApril
7.62%
7.55%
BAC
USB

Financials

BAC vs. USB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bank of America Corporation and U.S. Bancorp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items