PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAC vs. C
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BAC vs. C - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bank of America Corporation (BAC) and Citigroup Inc. (C). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAC achieves a -4.19% return, which is significantly lower than C's 12.46% return. Over the past 10 years, BAC has outperformed C with an annualized return of 16.28%, while C has yielded a comparatively lower 14.47% annualized return.


BAC

1D
-0.15%
1M
0.40%
YTD
-4.19%
6M
-2.07%
1Y
20.00%
3Y*
25.09%
5Y*
6.37%
10Y*
16.28%

C

1D
-1.01%
1M
3.42%
YTD
12.46%
6M
22.96%
1Y
73.63%
3Y*
45.73%
5Y*
14.21%
10Y*
14.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAC vs. C - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
-4.19%28.04%33.85%4.83%-23.82%49.61%-11.63%46.19%-15.00%35.69%
C
Citigroup Inc.
12.46%70.38%41.93%18.98%-22.09%0.93%-19.70%57.82%-28.49%27.03%

Correlation

The correlation between BAC and C is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 1986

0.64

The correlation between BAC and C shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (all time) to 0.82 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BAC:

$388.68B

C:

$230.76B

EPS

BAC:

$4.19

C:

$8.65

PE Ratio

BAC:

12.50

C:

15.02

PS Ratio

BAC:

2.27

C:

1.40

PB Ratio

BAC:

1.41

C:

1.21

Total Revenue (TTM)

BAC:

$174.85B

C:

$171.19B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BAC:

$110.47B

C:

$77.85B

EBITDA (TTM)

BAC:

$41.74B

C:

$24.12B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BAC vs. C — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAC
BAC Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
BAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAC Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
BAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAC Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

C
C Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
C Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
C Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
C Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
C Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
C Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAC vs. C - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bank of America Corporation (BAC) and Citigroup Inc. (C). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BACCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.42

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.12

5.01

-3.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.89

14.45

-11.55

BAC vs. C - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAC Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is lower than the C Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAC and C, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BACCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

2.66

-1.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

0.49

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.44

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.15

+0.05

Drawdowns

BAC vs. C - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAC drawdown since its inception was -93.10%, roughly equal to the maximum C drawdown of -98.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAC and C.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BACCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.10%

-98.00%

+4.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.93%

-14.76%

-3.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.51%

-31.31%

+3.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.64%

-47.56%

+0.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.95%

-56.51%

+7.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.95%

-65.32%

+57.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.32%

-43.50%

+15.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.93%

5.11%

+1.82%

Volatility

BAC vs. C - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bank of America Corporation (BAC) is 6.22%, while Citigroup Inc. (C) has a volatility of 7.44%. This indicates that BAC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than C based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BACCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.22%

7.44%

-1.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.10%

22.66%

-6.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.33%

27.86%

-6.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.85%

29.11%

-2.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.68%

33.20%

-2.52%

Dividends

BAC vs. C - Dividend Comparison

BAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, more than C's 1.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
2.10%1.96%2.28%2.73%2.60%1.75%2.38%1.87%2.19%1.32%1.13%1.19%
C
Citigroup Inc.
1.85%1.99%3.10%4.04%4.51%3.38%3.31%2.40%2.96%1.29%0.71%0.31%

Financials

BAC vs. C - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bank of America Corporation and Citigroup Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00B40.00B45.00B50.00B20222023202420252026
30.27B
44.14B
(BAC) Total Revenue
(C) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BAC vs. C - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Bank of America Corporation and Citigroup Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
95.6%
49.3%
Portfolio components
BAC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bank of America Corporation reported a gross profit of 28.94B and revenue of 30.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.6%.

C - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Citigroup Inc. reported a gross profit of 21.76B and revenue of 44.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.3%.

BAC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bank of America Corporation reported an operating income of 10.40B and revenue of 30.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.4%.

C - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Citigroup Inc. reported an operating income of 7.52B and revenue of 44.14B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.0%.

BAC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bank of America Corporation reported a net income of 8.58B and revenue of 30.27B, resulting in a net margin of 28.4%.

C - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Citigroup Inc. reported a net income of 5.79B and revenue of 44.14B, resulting in a net margin of 13.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BAC and C have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

C has higher volatility (7.44%) compared to BAC (6.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAC dropped -93.10% vs C's -98.00%.

C currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BAC and C

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer