PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BAC vs. GS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


BACGS
YTD Return12.31%12.47%
1Y Return32.31%29.41%
3Y Return (Ann)-0.05%10.19%
5Y Return (Ann)7.04%18.96%
10Y Return (Ann)11.64%12.65%
Sharpe Ratio1.401.37
Daily Std Dev24.32%22.04%
Max Drawdown-93.45%-78.84%
Current Drawdown-19.20%0.00%

Fundamentals


BACGS
Market Cap$297.60B$138.76B
EPS$2.90$25.65
PE Ratio13.0416.67
PEG Ratio3.693.14
Revenue (TTM)$93.36B$46.73B
Gross Profit (TTM)$92.41B$37.53B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.7

The correlation between BAC and GS is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

BAC vs. GS - Performance Comparison

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BAC having a 12.31% return and GS slightly higher at 12.47%. Over the past 10 years, BAC has underperformed GS with an annualized return of 11.64%, while GS has yielded a comparatively higher 12.65% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%200.00%400.00%600.00%800.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
104.16%
752.49%
BAC
GS

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Bank of America Corporation

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BAC vs. GS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bank of America Corporation (BAC) and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BAC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BAC, currently valued at 1.40, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.40
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BAC, currently valued at 2.17, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.17
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BAC, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.25
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BAC, currently valued at 0.73, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.73
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BAC, currently valued at 4.11, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.004.11
GS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GS, currently valued at 1.37, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.37
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GS, currently valued at 2.16, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.16
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GS, currently valued at 1.24, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.24
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GS, currently valued at 1.08, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.08
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GS, currently valued at 4.79, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.004.79

BAC vs. GS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAC Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which roughly equals the GS Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of BAC and GS.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.50NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
1.40
1.37
BAC
GS

Dividends

BAC vs. GS - Dividend Comparison

BAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, which matches GS's 2.50% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
2.50%2.73%2.60%1.75%2.38%1.87%2.19%1.32%1.13%1.19%0.67%0.26%
GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
2.50%2.72%2.62%1.70%1.90%1.80%1.89%1.14%1.09%1.41%1.16%1.16%

Drawdowns

BAC vs. GS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAC drawdown since its inception was -93.45%, which is greater than GS's maximum drawdown of -78.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAC and GS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
-19.20%
0
BAC
GS

Volatility

BAC vs. GS - Volatility Comparison

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) has a higher volatility of 7.55% compared to The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) at 7.02%. This indicates that BAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
7.55%
7.02%
BAC
GS

Financials

BAC vs. GS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bank of America Corporation and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items