BAC vs. GS
Compare and contrast key facts about Bank of America Corporation (BAC) and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BAC or GS.
Correlation
The correlation between BAC and GS is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
BAC vs. GS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
BAC:
1.73
GS:
2.94
BAC:
2.62
GS:
4.07
BAC:
1.32
GS:
1.55
BAC:
1.37
GS:
7.89
BAC:
6.91
GS:
26.32
BAC:
5.57%
GS:
2.95%
BAC:
22.31%
GS:
26.40%
BAC:
-93.45%
GS:
-78.84%
BAC:
-3.62%
GS:
-0.60%
Fundamentals
BAC:
$350.18B
GS:
$208.49B
BAC:
$3.21
GS:
$40.53
BAC:
14.33
GS:
16.49
BAC:
1.73
GS:
4.02
BAC:
$101.89B
GS:
$53.16B
BAC:
$63.17B
GS:
$53.16B
BAC:
$46.02B
GS:
$21.77B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BAC achieves a 4.69% return, which is significantly lower than GS's 16.68% return. Over the past 10 years, BAC has underperformed GS with an annualized return of 13.25%, while GS has yielded a comparatively higher 15.61% annualized return.
BAC
4.69%
-1.12%
20.17%
38.93%
8.72%
13.25%
GS
16.68%
6.74%
36.05%
77.97%
26.89%
15.61%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BAC vs. GS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
BAC
GS
BAC vs. GS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bank of America Corporation (BAC) and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BAC vs. GS - Dividend Comparison
BAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, more than GS's 1.72% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAC Bank of America Corporation | 2.17% | 2.28% | 2.73% | 2.60% | 1.75% | 2.38% | 1.87% | 2.19% | 1.32% | 1.13% | 1.19% | 0.67% |
GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 1.72% | 2.01% | 2.72% | 2.62% | 1.70% | 1.90% | 1.80% | 1.89% | 1.14% | 1.09% | 1.41% | 1.16% |
Drawdowns
BAC vs. GS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAC drawdown since its inception was -93.45%, which is greater than GS's maximum drawdown of -78.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAC and GS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BAC vs. GS - Volatility Comparison
Bank of America Corporation (BAC) and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) have volatilities of 4.60% and 4.68%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
BAC vs. GS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bank of America Corporation and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities