BAC vs. WFC

In the year-to-date period, BAC achieves a 40.71% return, which is significantly lower than WFC's 56.05% return. Over the past 10 years, BAC has outperformed WFC with an annualized return of 12.79%, while WFC has yielded a comparatively lower 6.32% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bank of America Corporation (BAC) and Wells Fargo & Company (WFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current BAC Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is comparable to the WFC Sharpe Ratio of 2.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAC and WFC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

BAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%, more than WFC's 2.00% yield.

The maximum BAC drawdown since its inception was -93.45%, which is greater than WFC's maximum drawdown of -79.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAC and WFC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Bank of America Corporation (BAC) is 9.45%, while Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) has a volatility of 13.98%. This indicates that BAC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bank of America Corporation and Wells Fargo & Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.