BAC vs. WFC
Compare and contrast key facts about Bank of America Corporation (BAC) and Wells Fargo & Company (WFC).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BAC or WFC.
Correlation
The correlation between BAC and WFC is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
BAC vs. WFC - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
BAC:
1.64
WFC:
1.61
BAC:
2.50
WFC:
2.43
BAC:
1.30
WFC:
1.32
BAC:
1.16
WFC:
2.67
BAC:
6.69
WFC:
7.65
BAC:
5.58%
WFC:
6.06%
BAC:
22.71%
WFC:
28.71%
BAC:
-93.45%
WFC:
-79.01%
BAC:
-7.02%
WFC:
-9.06%
Fundamentals
BAC:
$345.66B
WFC:
$235.76B
BAC:
$2.76
WFC:
$4.81
BAC:
16.32
WFC:
14.72
BAC:
2.00
WFC:
3.30
BAC:
$97.40B
WFC:
$81.33B
BAC:
$58.68B
WFC:
$82.81B
BAC:
$42.54B
WFC:
$50.48B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BAC achieves a 34.52% return, which is significantly lower than WFC's 46.69% return. Over the past 10 years, BAC has outperformed WFC with an annualized return of 11.77%, while WFC has yielded a comparatively lower 5.43% annualized return.
BAC
34.52%
-3.57%
13.21%
36.43%
7.44%
11.77%
WFC
46.69%
-6.00%
22.69%
46.81%
8.37%
5.43%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BAC vs. WFC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bank of America Corporation (BAC) and Wells Fargo & Company (WFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BAC vs. WFC - Dividend Comparison
BAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, more than WFC's 2.13% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAC Bank of America Corporation | 2.26% | 2.73% | 2.60% | 1.75% | 2.38% | 1.87% | 2.19% | 1.32% | 1.13% | 1.19% | 0.67% | 0.26% |
WFC Wells Fargo & Company | 2.13% | 2.64% | 2.66% | 1.25% | 4.04% | 3.57% | 3.56% | 2.54% | 2.75% | 2.71% | 2.46% | 2.53% |
Drawdowns
BAC vs. WFC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAC drawdown since its inception was -93.45%, which is greater than WFC's maximum drawdown of -79.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAC and WFC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BAC vs. WFC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Bank of America Corporation (BAC) is 5.47%, while Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) has a volatility of 6.78%. This indicates that BAC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
BAC vs. WFC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bank of America Corporation and Wells Fargo & Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities