IWMI vs. CSHI

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) and Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI).

IWMI and CSHI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IWMI is an actively managed fund by Neos. It was launched on Jun 24, 2024. CSHI is a passively managed fund by Neos that tracks the performance of the NONE. It was launched on Aug 29, 2022.

Performance

IWMI vs. CSHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) and Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

IWMI vs. CSHI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
IWMI NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF	1.35%	14.97%	6.61%
CSHI Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF	1.30%	5.05%	2.95%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IWMI having a 1.35% return and CSHI slightly lower at 1.30%.

IWMI

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: -4.18%
• YTD: 1.35%
• 6M: 4.98%
• 1Y: 26.02%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CSHI

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.57%
• YTD: 1.30%
• 6M: 2.60%
• 1Y: 5.30%
• 3Y*: 5.49%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWMI vs. CSHI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWMI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than CSHI's 0.38% expense ratio.

IWMI

NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF

CSHI

Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF

Return for Risk

IWMI vs. CSHI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWMI

IWMI Risk / Return Rank: 76
IWMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
IWMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
IWMI Omega Ratio Rank: 71
IWMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
IWMI Martin Ratio Rank: 83

CSHI

CSHI Risk / Return Rank: 96
CSHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
CSHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
CSHI Omega Ratio Rank: 98
CSHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
CSHI Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWMI vs. CSHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) and Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IWMI	CSHI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	2.65	-1.28
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.98	3.92	-1.94
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.99	-0.72
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.09	3.21	-1.12
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.62	28.78	-19.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IWMI vs. CSHI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWMI Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the CSHI Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWMI and CSHI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IWMI	CSHI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.37	2.65	-1.28
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.72	4.09	-3.37

Correlation

The correlation between IWMI and CSHI is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

IWMI vs. CSHI - Dividend Comparison

IWMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.42%, more than CSHI's 4.98% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
IWMI NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF	14.42%	14.05%	8.78%	0.00%	0.00%
CSHI Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF	4.98%	5.11%	5.72%	6.15%	1.52%

Drawdowns

IWMI vs. CSHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWMI drawdown since its inception was -23.88%, which is greater than CSHI's maximum drawdown of -1.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWMI and CSHI.

Drawdown Indicators

	IWMI	CSHI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.88%	-1.69%	-22.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.42%	-1.69%	-10.73%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.80%	0.00%	-4.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.44%	-0.03%	-4.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.70%	0.19%	+2.51%

Volatility

IWMI vs. CSHI - Volatility Comparison

NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) has a higher volatility of 6.95% compared to Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI) at 0.39%. This indicates that IWMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IWMI	CSHI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.95%	0.39%	+6.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.89%	0.68%	+11.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.09%	2.01%	+17.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.28%	1.35%	+16.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.28%	1.35%	+16.93%