PortfoliosLab logo
IWMI vs. IWM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between IWMI and IWM is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 1.0

Performance

IWMI vs. IWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-9.62%
-8.88%
IWMI
IWM

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

IWMI:

18.77%

IWM:

21.82%

Max Drawdown

IWMI:

-21.37%

IWM:

-59.05%

Current Drawdown

IWMI:

-21.37%

IWM:

-24.86%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWMI achieves a -15.22% return, which is significantly higher than IWM's -17.81% return.


IWMI

YTD

-15.22%

1M

-11.70%

6M

-15.51%

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

IWM

YTD

-17.81%

1M

-12.89%

6M

-16.89%

1Y

-10.06%

5Y*

13.05%

10Y*

5.22%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IWMI vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWMI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for IWMI: current value is 0.68%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
IWMI: 0.68%
Expense ratio chart for IWM: current value is 0.19%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
IWM: 0.19%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

IWMI vs. IWM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWMI

IWM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IWM is 77
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IWM is 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IWM is 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IWM is 77
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IWM is 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IWM is 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

IWMI vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Chart placeholderNot enough data

Dividends

IWMI vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison

IWMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.14%, more than IWM's 1.36% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
IWMI
NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF
15.14%8.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
1.36%1.15%1.35%1.48%0.94%1.04%1.26%1.40%1.26%1.38%1.54%1.26%

Drawdowns

IWMI vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWMI drawdown since its inception was -21.37%, smaller than the maximum IWM drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWMI and IWM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-21.37%
-24.86%
IWMI
IWM

Volatility

IWMI vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) is 9.15%, while iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) has a volatility of 9.85%. This indicates that IWMI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
9.15%
9.85%
IWMI
IWM