CSHI vs. PULS
Compare and contrast key facts about Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI) and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS).
CSHI and PULS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CSHI is a passively managed fund by Neos that tracks the performance of the NONE. It was launched on Aug 29, 2022. PULS is an actively managed fund by Prudential. It was launched on Apr 5, 2018.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CSHI or PULS.
Performance
CSHI vs. PULS - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSHI achieves a 4.61% return, which is significantly lower than PULS's 5.47% return.
CSHI
4.61%
0.06%
2.44%
5.14%
N/A
N/A
PULS
5.47%
0.39%
2.89%
6.35%
3.10%
N/A
Key characteristics
| CSHI | PULS | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 4.56 | 12.22 |
| Sortino Ratio | 6.59 | 30.20 |
| Omega Ratio | 2.48 | 7.88 |
| Calmar Ratio | 10.52 | 63.77 |
| Martin Ratio | 87.00 | 393.30 |
| Ulcer Index | 0.06% | 0.02% |
| Daily Std Dev | 1.11% | 0.53% |
| Max Drawdown | -0.48% | -5.85% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.46% | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CSHI vs. PULS - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSHI has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than PULS's 0.15% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between CSHI and PULS is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CSHI vs. PULS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI) and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CSHI vs. PULS - Dividend Comparison
CSHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.31%, less than PULS's 5.69% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSHI Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF | 5.31% | 6.15% | 1.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF | 5.69% | 5.48% | 2.30% | 1.19% | 1.85% | 2.92% | 1.87% |
Drawdowns
CSHI vs. PULS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSHI drawdown since its inception was -0.48%, smaller than the maximum PULS drawdown of -5.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSHI and PULS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CSHI vs. PULS - Volatility Comparison
Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI) has a higher volatility of 0.52% compared to PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS) at 0.12%. This indicates that CSHI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PULS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.