PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
IWMI vs. QQQI
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between IWMI and QQQI is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.6

Performance

IWMI vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) and NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF (QQQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.24%
11.38%
IWMI
QQQI

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

IWMI:

16.31%

QQQI:

14.21%

Max Drawdown

IWMI:

-8.88%

QQQI:

-10.67%

Current Drawdown

IWMI:

-7.45%

QQQI:

-1.76%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWMI achieves a -0.22% return, which is significantly lower than QQQI's 3.24% return.


IWMI

YTD

-0.22%

1M

-3.26%

6M

0.23%

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

QQQI

YTD

3.24%

1M

-0.02%

6M

11.39%

1Y

20.53%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IWMI vs. QQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IWMI and QQQI have an expense ratio of 0.68%.


IWMI
NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF
Expense ratio chart for IWMI: current value at 0.68% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.68%
Expense ratio chart for QQQI: current value at 0.68% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.68%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

IWMI vs. QQQI — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWMI

QQQI
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QQQI is 7070
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QQQI is 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QQQI is 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QQQI is 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QQQI is 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QQQI is 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

IWMI vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) and NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
No data
IWMI
QQQI


Chart placeholderNot enough data

Dividends

IWMI vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison

IWMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.16%, less than QQQI's 12.65% yield.


TTM2024
IWMI
NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF
10.16%8.78%
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF
12.65%12.85%

Drawdowns

IWMI vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWMI drawdown since its inception was -8.88%, smaller than the maximum QQQI drawdown of -10.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWMI and QQQI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-7.45%
-1.76%
IWMI
QQQI

Volatility

IWMI vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison

NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) and NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF (QQQI) have volatilities of 3.76% and 3.79%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
3.76%
3.79%
IWMI
QQQI
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab