IWMI vs. SPY
IWMI (NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWMI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Neos, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. IWMI is actively managed, while SPY is passively managed. Over the past year, IWMI returned 35.89% vs 23.59% for SPY. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IWMI charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
IWMI vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWMI achieves a 16.33% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 8.15% return.
IWMI
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 3.68%
- YTD
- 16.33%
- 6M
- 14.17%
- 1Y
- 35.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPY
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -1.36%
- YTD
- 8.15%
- 6M
- 7.20%
- 1Y
- 23.59%
- 3Y*
- 20.68%
- 5Y*
- 13.05%
- 10Y*
- 15.53%
IWMI vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IWMI NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF | 16.33% | 14.97% | 6.58% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 8.15% | 17.72% | 8.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWMI and SPY is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2024 | 0.80 |
The correlation between IWMI and SPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
IWMI vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IWMI
SPY
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
IWMI
SPY
Technology
IWMI
SPY
Healthcare
IWMI
SPY
Financial Services
IWMI
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
IWMI
SPY
Real Estate
IWMI
SPY
Energy
IWMI
SPY
Basic Materials
IWMI
SPY
Utilities
IWMI
SPY
Communication Services
IWMI
SPY
Consumer Defensive
IWMI
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWMI vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
IWMI
SPY
IWMI vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IWMI | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.34 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.29 | 2.67 | +1.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.68 | 11.92 | +5.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IWMI vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWMI drawdown since its inception was -23.88%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWMI and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWMI | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.88% | -55.19% | +31.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.40% | -8.88% | +0.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.73% | -3.17% | +2.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.03% | -9.04% | +5.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 1.98% | +0.06% |
Volatility
IWMI vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) has a higher volatility of 5.22% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 4.87%. This indicates that IWMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWMI | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.22% | 4.87% | +0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.45% | 9.85% | +1.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.41% | 12.50% | +2.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.95% | 17.15% | +0.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.95% | 17.95% | 0.00% |
IWMI vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWMI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
IWMI vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
IWMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.53%, more than SPY's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWMI NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF | 14.53% | 14.05% | 8.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.03% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWMI and SPY have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IWMI has higher volatility (5.22%) compared to SPY (4.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWMI dropped -23.88% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 1-year performance, IWMI leads with 35.89% vs 23.59% for SPY. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 4.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IWMI has performed better with a 35.89% return vs 23.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for IWMI.
IWMI has the higher dividend yield at 14.53%, compared with 1.03% for SPY.
IWMI is categorized as Derivative Income, while SPY is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Neos and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for IWMI and 0.09% for SPY.
IWMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWMI and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer