PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSHI vs. THTA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSHI vs. THTA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CSHI) and SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF (THTA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSHI achieves a 2.41% return, which is significantly lower than THTA's 7.64% return.


CSHI

1D
0.00%
1M
0.29%
YTD
2.41%
6M
2.54%
1Y
5.17%
3Y*
5.41%
5Y*
10Y*

THTA

1D
0.32%
1M
0.84%
YTD
7.64%
6M
8.23%
1Y
16.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSHI vs. THTA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CSHI
NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
2.41%5.05%5.66%0.69%
THTA
SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF
7.64%-10.24%7.31%0.99%

Correlation

The correlation between CSHI and THTA is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2023

0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSHI vs. THTA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSHI
CSHI Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
CSHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSHI Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
CSHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSHI Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

THTA
THTA Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
THTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
THTA Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
THTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
THTA Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSHI vs. THTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CSHI) and SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF (THTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSHITHTADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+6.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.62

1.78

+0.84

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

24.49

6.39

+18.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

131.36

53.12

+78.24

CSHI vs. THTA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSHI Sharpe Ratio is 5.80, which is higher than the THTA Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSHI and THTA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSHI vs. THTA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSHI drawdown since its inception was -1.69%, smaller than the maximum THTA drawdown of -31.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSHI and THTA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSHITHTADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.69%

-31.41%

+29.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.21%

-2.64%

+2.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-6.11%

+6.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.03%

-7.49%

+7.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.04%

0.32%

-0.28%

Volatility

CSHI vs. THTA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CSHI) is 0.33%, while SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF (THTA) has a volatility of 0.95%. This indicates that CSHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than THTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSHITHTADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.33%

0.95%

-0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.60%

4.07%

-3.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90%

5.73%

-4.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.33%

20.05%

-18.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.33%

20.05%

-18.72%

CSHI vs. THTA - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSHI has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than THTA's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSHI vs. THTA - Dividend Comparison

CSHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.31%, less than THTA's 11.14% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CSHI
NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
5.31%5.11%5.72%6.15%1.52%
THTA
SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF
11.14%12.66%12.44%0.58%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSHI and THTA have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

THTA has higher volatility (0.95%) compared to CSHI (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSHI dropped -1.69% vs THTA's -31.41%.

On 1-year performance, THTA leads with 16.78% vs 5.17% for CSHI. On fees, CSHI is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, CSHI has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, THTA has performed better with a 16.78% return vs 5.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CSHI is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for THTA.

THTA has the higher dividend yield at 11.14%, compared with 5.31% for CSHI.

CSHI is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while THTA is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Neos and SoFi. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for CSHI and 0.49% for THTA.

CSHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.80 vs 2.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSHI and THTA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer