PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
IWMI vs. GPIQ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between IWMI and GPIQ is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.6

Performance

IWMI vs. GPIQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
6.68%
8.83%
IWMI
GPIQ

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

IWMI:

16.95%

GPIQ:

14.92%

Max Drawdown

IWMI:

-8.88%

GPIQ:

-11.66%

Current Drawdown

IWMI:

-7.18%

GPIQ:

-2.33%

Returns By Period


IWMI

YTD

N/A

1M

-4.80%

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

GPIQ

YTD

24.56%

1M

2.72%

6M

8.85%

1Y

25.08%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IWMI vs. GPIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWMI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than GPIQ's 0.29% expense ratio.


IWMI
NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF
Expense ratio chart for IWMI: current value at 0.68% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.68%
Expense ratio chart for GPIQ: current value at 0.29% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.29%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

IWMI vs. GPIQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
No data
IWMI
GPIQ


Chart placeholderNot enough data

Dividends

IWMI vs. GPIQ - Dividend Comparison

IWMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.43%, less than GPIQ's 9.86% yield.


TTM2023
IWMI
NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF
7.43%0.00%
GPIQ
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF
9.86%1.74%

Drawdowns

IWMI vs. GPIQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWMI drawdown since its inception was -8.88%, smaller than the maximum GPIQ drawdown of -11.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWMI and GPIQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-7.18%
-2.33%
IWMI
GPIQ

Volatility

IWMI vs. GPIQ - Volatility Comparison

NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) has a higher volatility of 4.70% compared to Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) at 3.67%. This indicates that IWMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
4.70%
3.67%
IWMI
GPIQ
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab