PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSHI vs. HIGH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSHI vs. HIGH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CSHI) and Simplify Enhanced Income ETF (HIGH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSHI achieves a 2.66% return, which is significantly higher than HIGH's -0.37% return.


CSHI

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.34%
6M
2.58%
YTD
2.66%
1Y
5.09%
3Y*
5.39%
5Y*
10Y*

HIGH

1D
-0.28%
1M
0.07%
6M
-0.75%
YTD
-0.37%
1Y
-3.09%
3Y*
2.82%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSHI vs. HIGH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CSHI
NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
2.66%5.05%5.66%6.21%0.74%
HIGH
Simplify Enhanced Income ETF
-0.37%4.35%1.52%7.70%0.47%

Correlation

The correlation between CSHI and HIGH is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2022

0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSHI vs. HIGH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSHI
CSHI Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
CSHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSHI Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
CSHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSHI Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

HIGH
HIGH Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
HIGH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIGH Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIGH Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
HIGH Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIGH Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSHI vs. HIGH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CSHI) and Simplify Enhanced Income ETF (HIGH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSHIHIGHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+6.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+11.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.75

0.93

+1.82

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

24.12

-0.44

+24.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

138.63

-0.72

+139.35

CSHI vs. HIGH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSHI Sharpe Ratio is 5.97, which is higher than the HIGH Sharpe Ratio of -0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSHI and HIGH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSHI vs. HIGH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSHI drawdown since its inception was -1.69%, smaller than the maximum HIGH drawdown of -9.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSHI and HIGH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSHIHIGHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.69%

-9.50%

+7.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.21%

-7.08%

+6.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.69%

-9.50%

+7.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

-7.11%

+7.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.03%

-2.51%

+2.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.04%

4.32%

-4.28%

Volatility

CSHI vs. HIGH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CSHI) is 0.18%, while Simplify Enhanced Income ETF (HIGH) has a volatility of 2.10%. This indicates that CSHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HIGH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSHIHIGHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.18%

2.10%

-1.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.59%

3.72%

-3.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86%

7.30%

-6.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.32%

9.49%

-8.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.32%

9.49%

-8.17%

CSHI vs. HIGH - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSHI has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than HIGH's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSHI vs. HIGH - Dividend Comparison

CSHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.86%, less than HIGH's 7.09% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CSHI
NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
4.86%5.11%5.72%6.15%1.52%
HIGH
Simplify Enhanced Income ETF
7.09%7.71%8.34%9.40%0.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSHI and HIGH have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HIGH has higher volatility (2.10%) compared to CSHI (0.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSHI dropped -1.69% vs HIGH's -9.50%.

On 3-year performance, CSHI leads with 5.39% vs 2.82% for HIGH. On fees, CSHI is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, CSHI has been the lower-risk option at 0.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, CSHI has performed better with a 5.39% return vs 2.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CSHI is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HIGH.

HIGH has the higher dividend yield at 7.09%, compared with 4.86% for CSHI.

CSHI is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while HIGH is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Neos and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for CSHI and 0.50% for HIGH.

CSHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.97 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSHI and HIGH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer