PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWMI vs. SPYI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWMI vs. SPYI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) and NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF (SPYI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWMI achieves a 16.33% return, which is significantly higher than SPYI's 5.56% return.


IWMI

1D
-0.73%
1M
3.68%
YTD
16.33%
6M
14.17%
1Y
35.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPYI

1D
-1.30%
1M
-1.23%
YTD
5.56%
6M
4.95%
1Y
19.05%
3Y*
15.16%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWMI vs. SPYI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IWMI
NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF
16.33%14.97%6.58%
SPYI
NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF
5.56%16.67%8.01%

Correlation

The correlation between IWMI and SPYI is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2024

0.79

The correlation between IWMI and SPYI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

IWMI vs. SPYI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IWMI
SPYI

Industrials

17.7%
7.8%

Technology

17.0%
39.1%

Healthcare

16.5%
8.3%

Financial Services

15.7%
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
9.9%

Real Estate

6.1%
1.8%

Energy

6.1%
3.1%

Basic Materials

4.8%
1.7%

Utilities

2.9%
2.1%

Communication Services

2.4%
10.7%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
4.5%

Industrials

IWMI
17.7%
SPYI
7.8%

Technology

IWMI
17.0%
SPYI
39.1%

Healthcare

IWMI
16.5%
SPYI
8.3%

Financial Services

IWMI
15.7%
SPYI
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

IWMI
8.4%
SPYI
9.9%

Real Estate

IWMI
6.1%
SPYI
1.8%

Energy

IWMI
6.1%
SPYI
3.1%

Basic Materials

IWMI
4.8%
SPYI
1.7%

Utilities

IWMI
2.9%
SPYI
2.1%

Communication Services

IWMI
2.4%
SPYI
10.7%

Consumer Defensive

IWMI
2.4%
SPYI
4.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWMI vs. SPYI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWMI
IWMI Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
IWMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWMI Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
IWMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWMI Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYI
SPYI Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
SPYI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYI Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYI Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWMI vs. SPYI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) and NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF (SPYI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IWMISPYIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.36

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.29

2.48

+1.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.68

12.37

+5.31

IWMI vs. SPYI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWMI Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the SPYI Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWMI and SPYI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IWMI vs. SPYI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWMI drawdown since its inception was -23.88%, which is greater than SPYI's maximum drawdown of -16.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWMI and SPYI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWMISPYIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.88%

-16.47%

-7.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.40%

-7.72%

-0.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-2.49%

+1.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.03%

-1.81%

-2.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

1.54%

+0.50%

Volatility

IWMI vs. SPYI - Volatility Comparison

NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) has a higher volatility of 5.22% compared to NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF (SPYI) at 4.27%. This indicates that IWMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWMISPYIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.22%

4.27%

+0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.45%

8.32%

+3.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.41%

10.34%

+5.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.95%

13.02%

+4.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.95%

13.02%

+4.93%

IWMI vs. SPYI - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IWMI and SPYI have an expense ratio of 0.68%.


Dividends

IWMI vs. SPYI - Dividend Comparison

IWMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.53%, more than SPYI's 13.02% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
IWMI
NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF
14.53%14.05%8.78%0.00%0.00%
SPYI
NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF
13.02%11.70%12.04%12.01%4.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWMI and SPYI have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IWMI has higher volatility (5.22%) compared to SPYI (4.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWMI dropped -23.88% vs SPYI's -16.47%.

On 1-year performance, IWMI leads with 35.89% vs 19.05% for SPYI. Both ETFs have the same 0.68% expense ratio. On volatility, SPYI has been the lower-risk option at 4.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IWMI has performed better with a 35.89% return vs 19.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IWMI and SPYI have the same expense ratio: 0.68% per year.

IWMI has the higher dividend yield at 14.53%, compared with 13.02% for SPYI.

IWMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWMI and SPYI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer