IWMI vs. AMDW

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

IWMI (NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF) and AMDW (Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IWMI charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for AMDW.

Performance

IWMI vs. AMDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWMI achieves a 16.33% return, which is significantly lower than AMDW's 176.01% return.

IWMI

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: 3.68%
• YTD: 16.33%
• 6M: 14.17%
• 1Y: 35.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AMDW

• 1D: -7.20%
• 1M: 12.58%
• YTD: 176.01%
• 6M: 174.69%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWMI vs. AMDW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IWMI NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF	16.33%	10.71%
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF	176.01%	36.56%

Correlation

The correlation between IWMI and AMDW is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025	0.53

IWMI vs. AMDW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IWMI	AMDW
Industrials	17.7%	-
Technology	17.0%	27.8%
Healthcare	16.5%	-
Financial Services	15.7%	-
Consumer Cyclical	8.4%	-
Real Estate	6.1%	-
Energy	6.1%	-
Basic Materials	4.8%	-
Utilities	2.9%	-
Communication Services	2.4%	-
Consumer Defensive	2.4%	-

Return for Risk

IWMI vs. AMDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWMI

IWMI Risk / Return Rank: 79
IWMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
IWMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
IWMI Omega Ratio Rank: 72
IWMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
IWMI Martin Ratio Rank: 87

AMDW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWMI vs. AMDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IWMI	AMDW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.34	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.23	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.29	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.68	—	—

Drawdowns

IWMI vs. AMDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWMI drawdown since its inception was -23.88%, smaller than the maximum AMDW drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWMI and AMDW.

Drawdown Indicators

	IWMI	AMDW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.88%	-34.64%	+10.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.40%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.73%	-7.20%	+6.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.03%	-14.25%	+10.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.04%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IWMI	AMDW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.22%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.45%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.41%	83.41%	-68.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.95%	83.41%	-65.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.95%	83.41%	-65.46%

IWMI vs. AMDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWMI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

IWMI vs. AMDW - Dividend Comparison

IWMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.53%, less than AMDW's 37.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF	37.14%	34.78%	0.00%
IWMI NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF	14.53%	14.05%	8.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IWMI and AMDW in my portfolio?

IWMI and AMDW have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IWMI or AMDW?

On fees, IWMI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IWMI or AMDW?

IWMI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMDW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IWMI or AMDW?

AMDW has the higher dividend yield at 37.14%, compared with 14.53% for IWMI.

What is the main difference between IWMI and AMDW?

They also come from different issuers: Neos and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for IWMI and 0.99% for AMDW.