AMDW vs. ICRC
AMDW (Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF) and ICRC (Bitwise CRCL Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.31 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. AMDW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for ICRC.
Performance
AMDW vs. ICRC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMDW achieves a 146.74% return, which is significantly higher than ICRC's -28.31% return.
AMDW
- 1D
- -2.02%
- 1M
- -10.13%
- 6M
- 119.90%
- YTD
- 146.74%
- 1Y
- 209.29%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 229.60%
ICRC
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -3.85%
- 6M
- -15.91%
- YTD
- -28.31%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $10.26M | $9.58M | $8.51M | |
| $21.94K | $14.71K | $12.75K |
AMDW vs. ICRC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF | 146.74% | 33.62% |
ICRC Bitwise CRCL Option Income Strategy ETF | -28.31% | -32.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMDW and ICRC is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMDW vs. ICRC — Risk / Return Rank
AMDW
ICRC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AMDW vs. ICRC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW) and Bitwise CRCL Option Income Strategy ETF (ICRC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMDW | ICRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.83 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.47 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMDW vs. ICRC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMDW drawdown since its inception was -34.64%, smaller than the maximum ICRC drawdown of -56.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMDW and ICRC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMDW | ICRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.64% | -56.09% | +21.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.39% | -55.33% | +33.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.97% | -35.92% | +21.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.59% | — | — |
Volatility
AMDW vs. ICRC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMDW | ICRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 28.87% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 67.40% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 85.70% | 66.48% | +19.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 85.05% | 66.48% | +18.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 85.05% | 66.48% | +18.57% |
AMDW vs. ICRC - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMDW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than ICRC's 0.98% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMDW vs. ICRC - Dividend Comparison
AMDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 53.42%, less than ICRC's 59.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF | 53.42% | 34.78% |
ICRC Bitwise CRCL Option Income Strategy ETF | 59.47% | 17.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMDW and ICRC have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ICRC is cheaper at 0.98% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ICRC is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMDW.
ICRC has the higher dividend yield at 59.47%, compared with 53.42% for AMDW.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Bitwise. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AMDW and 0.98% for ICRC.
Find the right allocation for AMDW and ICRC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer