AMDW vs. ULTI
AMDW (Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF) and ULTI (REX IncomeMax Option Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.62 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. AMDW charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for ULTI.
Performance
AMDW vs. ULTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMDW achieves a 150.89% return, which is significantly higher than ULTI's -15.56% return.
AMDW
- 1D
- 1.68%
- 1M
- -8.62%
- 6M
- 113.70%
- YTD
- 150.89%
- 1Y
- 214.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 231.82%
ULTI
- 1D
- 4.83%
- 1M
- -21.67%
- 6M
- -22.89%
- YTD
- -15.56%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $10.29M | $9.36M | $8.60M | |
| $656.99K | $787.33K | $1.14M |
AMDW vs. ULTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF | 150.89% | -20.38% |
ULTI REX IncomeMax Option Strategy ETF | -15.56% | -38.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMDW and ULTI is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2025 | 0.62 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMDW vs. ULTI — Risk / Return Rank
AMDW
ULTI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AMDW vs. ULTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW) and REX IncomeMax Option Strategy ETF (ULTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMDW | ULTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.23 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.22 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMDW vs. ULTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMDW drawdown since its inception was -34.64%, smaller than the maximum ULTI drawdown of -54.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMDW and ULTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMDW | ULTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.64% | -54.23% | +19.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.07% | -48.22% | +28.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.99% | -29.76% | +15.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.63% | — | — |
Volatility
AMDW vs. ULTI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMDW | ULTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 28.57% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 66.95% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 85.77% | 61.63% | +24.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 84.89% | 61.63% | +23.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 84.89% | 61.63% | +23.26% |
AMDW vs. ULTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMDW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than ULTI's 1.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMDW vs. ULTI - Dividend Comparison
AMDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 55.51%, less than ULTI's 98.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF | 55.51% | 34.78% |
ULTI REX IncomeMax Option Strategy ETF | 98.40% | 14.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMDW and ULTI have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMDW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMDW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for ULTI.
ULTI has the higher dividend yield at 98.40%, compared with 55.51% for AMDW.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and REX Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AMDW and 1.25% for ULTI.
Find the right allocation for AMDW and ULTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer