AMDW vs. HBTA

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

AMDW (Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF) and HBTA (Horizon Expedition Plus ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AMDW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for HBTA.

Performance

AMDW vs. HBTA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW) and Horizon Expedition Plus ETF (HBTA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMDW achieves a 197.43% return, which is significantly higher than HBTA's 12.74% return.

AMDW

• 1D: 3.42%
• 1M: 21.31%
• YTD: 197.43%
• 6M: 195.46%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HBTA

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: 1.29%
• YTD: 12.74%
• 6M: 12.06%
• 1Y: 36.32%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMDW vs. HBTA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF	197.43%	36.56%
HBTA Horizon Expedition Plus ETF	12.74%	11.91%

Correlation

The correlation between AMDW and HBTA is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025	0.59

Return for Risk

AMDW vs. HBTA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMDW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

HBTA

HBTA Risk / Return Rank: 61
HBTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
HBTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
HBTA Omega Ratio Rank: 60
HBTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
HBTA Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMDW vs. HBTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW) and Horizon Expedition Plus ETF (HBTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AMDW	HBTA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.01	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.66	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.35	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.77	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	12.56	—

Drawdowns

AMDW vs. HBTA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMDW drawdown since its inception was -34.64%, which is greater than HBTA's maximum drawdown of -26.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMDW and HBTA.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMDW	HBTA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.64%	-26.73%	-7.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-13.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.83%	+1.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.28%	-4.17%	-10.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.90%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AMDW	HBTA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.84%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	14.46%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	83.18%	18.15%	+65.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	83.18%	24.99%	+58.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	83.18%	24.99%	+58.19%

AMDW vs. HBTA - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMDW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than HBTA's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMDW vs. HBTA - Dividend Comparison

AMDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 34.46%, more than HBTA's 0.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF	34.46%	34.78%
HBTA Horizon Expedition Plus ETF	0.57%	0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMDW and HBTA in my portfolio?

AMDW and HBTA have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AMDW or HBTA?

On fees, HBTA is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMDW or HBTA?

HBTA is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMDW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMDW or HBTA?

AMDW has the higher dividend yield at 34.46%, compared with 0.57% for HBTA.

What is the main difference between AMDW and HBTA?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Horizon. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AMDW and 0.85% for HBTA.