IWL vs. ILCB

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

IWL (iShares Russell Top 200 ETF) and ILCB (iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds from iShares - IWL tracks the Russell Top 200 Index while ILCB tracks the Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWL returned 16.38%/yr vs 14.97%/yr for ILCB. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IWL charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for ILCB.

Performance

IWL vs. ILCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell Top 200 ETF (IWL) and iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWL achieves a 6.83% return, which is significantly lower than ILCB's 8.52% return. Over the past 10 years, IWL has outperformed ILCB with an annualized return of 16.38%, while ILCB has yielded a comparatively lower 14.97% annualized return.

IWL

• 1D: -1.37%
• 1M: -1.88%
• YTD: 6.83%
• 6M: 5.97%
• 1Y: 23.48%
• 3Y*: 21.53%
• 5Y*: 13.60%
• 10Y*: 16.38%

ILCB

• 1D: -1.36%
• 1M: -1.01%
• YTD: 8.52%
• 6M: 7.55%
• 1Y: 23.81%
• 3Y*: 21.04%
• 5Y*: 12.58%
• 10Y*: 14.97%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWL vs. ILCB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IWL iShares Russell Top 200 ETF	6.83%	19.09%	27.12%	29.77%	-19.89%	27.79%	22.10%	31.42%	-3.30%	22.90%
ILCB iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF	8.52%	17.70%	24.96%	26.91%	-19.48%	24.07%	19.40%	32.68%	-8.51%	22.09%

Correlation

The correlation between IWL and ILCB is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.99
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.99
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2009	0.92

The correlation between IWL and ILCB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

IWL vs. ILCB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IWL	ILCB
Technology	41.8%	38.9%
Communication Services	12.1%	9.9%
Financial Services	11.1%	11.4%
Consumer Cyclical	9.7%	9.3%
Healthcare	8.5%	8.4%
Industrials	6.3%	8.4%
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	4.5%
Energy	2.4%	3.1%
Basic Materials	1.4%	1.8%
Utilities	1.2%	2.6%
Real Estate	0.9%	1.7%

Return for Risk

IWL vs. ILCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWL

IWL Risk / Return Rank: 55
IWL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
IWL Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
IWL Omega Ratio Rank: 55
IWL Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
IWL Martin Ratio Rank: 60

ILCB

ILCB Risk / Return Rank: 60
ILCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
ILCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
ILCB Omega Ratio Rank: 59
ILCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
ILCB Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWL vs. ILCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Top 200 ETF (IWL) and iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IWL	ILCB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.83	1.89	-0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.49	2.59	-0.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.34	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.40	2.63	-0.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.25	11.66	-1.41

IWL vs. ILCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWL Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the ILCB Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWL and ILCB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IWL vs. ILCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWL drawdown since its inception was -32.71%, smaller than the maximum ILCB drawdown of -51.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWL and ILCB.

Drawdown Indicators

	IWL	ILCB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.71%	-51.53%	+18.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.83%	-9.09%	-0.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.15%	-19.05%	-0.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.65%	-25.47%	-0.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.71%	-35.30%	+2.59%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.71%	-3.00%	-0.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.88%	-6.23%	+2.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.30%	2.05%	+0.25%

Volatility

IWL vs. ILCB - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell Top 200 ETF (IWL) and iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) have volatilities of 5.02% and 4.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IWL	ILCB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.02%	4.82%	+0.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.11%	9.99%	+0.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.89%	12.66%	+0.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.28%	17.23%	+0.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.11%	18.20%	-0.09%

IWL vs. ILCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IWL vs. ILCB - Dividend Comparison

IWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than ILCB's 1.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ILCB iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF	1.00%	1.11%	1.19%	1.43%	1.65%	1.16%	1.26%	2.25%	2.17%	1.81%	1.97%	2.44%
IWL iShares Russell Top 200 ETF	0.87%	0.90%	1.04%	1.30%	1.54%	1.12%	1.30%	1.96%	1.93%	1.69%	1.96%	2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IWL and ILCB in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, IWL and ILCB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, IWL or ILCB?

IWL has higher volatility (5.02%) compared to ILCB (4.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWL dropped -32.71% vs ILCB's -51.53%.

Which ETF is better, IWL or ILCB?

On 10-year performance, IWL leads with 16.38% vs 14.97% for ILCB. On fees, ILCB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ILCB has been the lower-risk option at 4.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IWL or ILCB?

Over the 10-year period, IWL has performed better with a 16.38% return vs 14.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IWL or ILCB?

ILCB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IWL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IWL or ILCB?

ILCB has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.87% for IWL.

What is the main difference between IWL and ILCB?

IWL tracks Russell Top 200 Index, while ILCB tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IWL and 0.03% for ILCB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ILCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.