IWL vs. IWY
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Russell Top 200 ETF (IWL) and iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY).
IWL and IWY are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IWL is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell Top 200 Index. It was launched on Sep 22, 2009. IWY is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell Top 200 Growth Index. It was launched on Sep 22, 2009. Both IWL and IWY are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IWL or IWY.
Correlation
The correlation between IWL and IWY is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IWL vs. IWY - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
IWL:
2.27
IWY:
2.15
IWL:
2.99
IWY:
2.77
IWL:
1.43
IWY:
1.39
IWL:
3.30
IWY:
2.76
IWL:
14.83
IWY:
10.40
IWL:
2.01%
IWY:
3.67%
IWL:
13.15%
IWY:
17.78%
IWL:
-32.71%
IWY:
-32.68%
IWL:
-1.64%
IWY:
-1.53%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWL achieves a 29.23% return, which is significantly lower than IWY's 38.02% return. Over the past 10 years, IWL has underperformed IWY with an annualized return of 13.91%, while IWY has yielded a comparatively higher 18.01% annualized return.
IWL
29.23%
1.13%
10.96%
29.65%
16.06%
13.91%
IWY
38.02%
5.44%
13.93%
38.19%
21.04%
18.01%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IWL vs. IWY - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IWY's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IWL vs. IWY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Top 200 ETF (IWL) and iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IWL vs. IWY - Dividend Comparison
IWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than IWY's 0.41% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWL iShares Russell Top 200 ETF | 1.03% | 1.30% | 1.53% | 1.12% | 1.30% | 1.96% | 1.93% | 1.69% | 1.96% | 2.14% | 1.68% | 1.82% |
IWY iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF | 0.41% | 0.68% | 0.88% | 0.50% | 0.71% | 1.06% | 1.32% | 1.26% | 1.51% | 1.58% | 1.44% | 1.56% |
Drawdowns
IWL vs. IWY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWL drawdown since its inception was -32.71%, roughly equal to the maximum IWY drawdown of -32.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWL and IWY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IWL vs. IWY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Russell Top 200 ETF (IWL) is 3.98%, while iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) has a volatility of 5.05%. This indicates that IWL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.