IWL vs. QQQM
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Russell Top 200 ETF (IWL) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM).
IWL and QQQM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IWL is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell Top 200 Index. It was launched on Sep 22, 2009. QQQM is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Oct 13, 2020. Both IWL and QQQM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
IWL vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IWL vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWL iShares Russell Top 200 ETF | -4.96% | 19.09% | 27.12% | 29.77% | -19.89% | 27.79% | 6.86% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | -4.75% | 20.85% | 25.68% | 55.01% | -32.52% | 27.45% | 6.67% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IWL having a -4.96% return and QQQM slightly higher at -4.75%.
IWL
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- -4.26%
- YTD
- -4.96%
- 6M
- -2.52%
- 1Y
- 18.46%
- 3Y*
- 19.81%
- 5Y*
- 12.42%
- 10Y*
- 14.87%
QQQM
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- -3.78%
- YTD
- -4.75%
- 6M
- -2.87%
- 1Y
- 24.28%
- 3Y*
- 22.91%
- 5Y*
- 13.24%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IWL vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IWL and QQQM have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
IWL vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank
IWL
QQQM
IWL vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Top 200 ETF (IWL) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IWL | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.00 | 1.09 | -0.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.53 | 1.68 | -0.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.24 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.60 | 2.02 | -0.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.94 | 7.35 | -0.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWL | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | 1.09 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 0.60 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.64 | +0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between IWL and QQQM is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
IWL vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison
IWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, more than QQQM's 0.53% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWL iShares Russell Top 200 ETF | 0.95% | 0.90% | 1.04% | 1.30% | 1.54% | 1.12% | 1.30% | 1.96% | 1.93% | 1.69% | 1.96% | 2.14% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.53% | 0.50% | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.83% | 0.40% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
IWL vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWL drawdown since its inception was -32.71%, smaller than the maximum QQQM drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWL and QQQM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWL | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.71% | -35.04% | +2.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.81% | -12.55% | +0.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.65% | -35.04% | +9.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.46% | -7.86% | +1.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.92% | -8.47% | +4.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.72% | 3.44% | -0.72% |
Volatility
IWL vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Russell Top 200 ETF (IWL) is 5.43%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a volatility of 6.58%. This indicates that IWL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IWL | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.43% | 6.58% | -1.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.72% | 12.79% | -3.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.49% | 22.45% | -3.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.17% | 22.24% | -5.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.06% | 22.26% | -4.20% |