PortfoliosLab logo
IWL vs. QUAL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between IWL and QUAL is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

IWL vs. QUAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell Top 200 ETF (IWL) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

IWL:

0.74

QUAL:

0.53

Sortino Ratio

IWL:

1.15

QUAL:

0.84

Omega Ratio

IWL:

1.17

QUAL:

1.12

Calmar Ratio

IWL:

0.77

QUAL:

0.51

Martin Ratio

IWL:

2.87

QUAL:

1.93

Ulcer Index

IWL:

5.15%

QUAL:

4.78%

Daily Std Dev

IWL:

20.10%

QUAL:

18.41%

Max Drawdown

IWL:

-32.71%

QUAL:

-34.06%

Current Drawdown

IWL:

-3.16%

QUAL:

-3.34%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWL achieves a 1.53% return, which is significantly higher than QUAL's 1.12% return. Over the past 10 years, IWL has outperformed QUAL with an annualized return of 13.56%, while QUAL has yielded a comparatively lower 12.39% annualized return.


IWL

YTD

1.53%

1M

13.25%

6M

2.13%

1Y

14.83%

3Y*

18.29%

5Y*

17.08%

10Y*

13.56%

QUAL

YTD

1.12%

1M

11.30%

6M

0.35%

1Y

9.66%

3Y*

17.21%

5Y*

15.44%

10Y*

12.39%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


iShares Russell Top 200 ETF

IWL vs. QUAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IWL and QUAL have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

IWL vs. QUAL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IWL is 6969
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IWL is 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IWL is 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IWL is 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IWL is 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IWL is 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

QUAL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QUAL is 5151
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QUAL is 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QUAL is 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QUAL is 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QUAL is 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QUAL is 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

IWL vs. QUAL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Top 200 ETF (IWL) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current IWL Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is higher than the QUAL Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWL and QUAL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

IWL vs. QUAL - Dividend Comparison

IWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, more than QUAL's 1.02% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
IWL
iShares Russell Top 200 ETF
1.04%1.04%1.30%1.53%1.12%1.30%1.96%1.93%1.69%1.96%2.14%1.68%
QUAL
iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
1.02%1.02%1.23%1.59%1.20%1.39%1.60%2.00%1.76%1.96%1.63%1.35%

Drawdowns

IWL vs. QUAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWL drawdown since its inception was -32.71%, roughly equal to the maximum QUAL drawdown of -34.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWL and QUAL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

IWL vs. QUAL - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell Top 200 ETF (IWL) has a higher volatility of 5.71% compared to iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) at 5.27%. This indicates that IWL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...