IVRS vs. XLKI
IVRS (iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF) and XLKI (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. IVRS is passively managed, while XLKI is actively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IVRS charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XLKI.
Performance
IVRS vs. XLKI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVRS achieves a -5.16% return, which is significantly lower than XLKI's 17.05% return.
IVRS
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 1.21%
- YTD
- -5.16%
- 6M
- -8.31%
- 1Y
- -1.69%
- 3Y*
- 9.45%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLKI
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 6.20%
- YTD
- 17.05%
- 6M
- 16.52%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IVRS vs. XLKI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IVRS iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF | -5.16% | -5.54% |
XLKI State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 17.05% | 10.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVRS and XLKI is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025 | 0.62 |
IVRS vs. XLKI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVRS
XLKI
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
IVRS
XLKI
-
Communication Services
IVRS
XLKI
-
Financial Services
IVRS
XLKI
Consumer Cyclical
IVRS
XLKI
-
Basic Materials
IVRS
-
XLKI
-
Consumer Defensive
IVRS
-
XLKI
-
Energy
IVRS
-
XLKI
-
Healthcare
IVRS
-
XLKI
-
Industrials
IVRS
-
XLKI
-
Real Estate
IVRS
-
XLKI
-
Utilities
IVRS
-
XLKI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVRS vs. XLKI — Risk / Return Rank
IVRS
XLKI
IVRS vs. XLKI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLKI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IVRS | XLKI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.05 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.12 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IVRS | XLKI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 2.16 | -1.55 |
Drawdowns
IVRS vs. XLKI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVRS drawdown since its inception was -31.43%, which is greater than XLKI's maximum drawdown of -10.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVRS and XLKI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVRS | XLKI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.43% | -10.24% | -21.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.41% | -1.35% | -17.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.83% | -1.61% | -4.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.60% | — | — |
Volatility
IVRS vs. XLKI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVRS | XLKI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.53% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.59% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.85% | 16.23% | +5.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.48% | 16.23% | +4.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.48% | 16.23% | +4.25% |
IVRS vs. XLKI - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVRS has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than XLKI's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVRS vs. XLKI - Dividend Comparison
IVRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.31%, less than XLKI's 14.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IVRS iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF | 8.31% | 7.88% | 6.65% | 0.48% |
XLKI State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 14.29% | 8.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVRS and XLKI have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLKI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLKI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IVRS.
XLKI has the higher dividend yield at 14.29%, compared with 8.31% for IVRS.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IVRS and 0.35% for XLKI.
Find the right allocation for IVRS and XLKI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer