IVRS vs. FFOG

In the year-to-date period, IVRS achieves a 7.30% return, which is significantly higher than FFOG's 2.59% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

IVRS has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than FFOG's 0.55% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) and Franklin Focused Growth ETF (FFOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current IVRS Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is comparable to the FFOG Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVRS and FFOG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

IVRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.20%, while FFOG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum IVRS drawdown since its inception was -19.14%, smaller than the maximum FFOG drawdown of -25.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVRS and FFOG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) is 4.89%, while Franklin Focused Growth ETF (FFOG) has a volatility of 8.61%. This indicates that IVRS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.