PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVRS vs. AIQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVRS vs. AIQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) and Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVRS achieves a -3.38% return, which is significantly lower than AIQ's 37.91% return.


IVRS

1D
-1.40%
1M
5.57%
YTD
-3.38%
6M
-6.57%
1Y
1.34%
3Y*
10.28%
5Y*
10Y*

AIQ

1D
1.01%
1M
23.44%
YTD
37.91%
6M
39.18%
1Y
72.55%
3Y*
38.15%
5Y*
19.70%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVRS vs. AIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IVRS
iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF
-3.38%12.75%7.40%28.15%
AIQ
Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF
37.91%31.89%24.11%32.29%

Correlation

The correlation between IVRS and AIQ is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2023

0.85

The correlation between IVRS and AIQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

IVRS vs. AIQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IVRS
AIQ

Technology

38.4%
73.3%

Communication Services

37.3%
13.2%

Financial Services

19.7%
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

4.6%
8.5%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

0.4%

Industrials

-

4.2%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

IVRS
38.4%
AIQ
73.3%

Communication Services

IVRS
37.3%
AIQ
13.2%

Financial Services

IVRS
19.7%
AIQ
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

IVRS
4.6%
AIQ
8.5%

Basic Materials

IVRS

-

AIQ

-

Consumer Defensive

IVRS

-

AIQ

-

Energy

IVRS

-

AIQ

-

Healthcare

IVRS

-

AIQ
0.4%

Industrials

IVRS

-

AIQ
4.2%

Real Estate

IVRS

-

AIQ

-

Utilities

IVRS

-

AIQ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVRS vs. AIQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVRS
IVRS Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
IVRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVRS Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
IVRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVRS Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

AIQ
AIQ Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
AIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
AIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVRS vs. AIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) and Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IVRSAIQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.06

3.17

-3.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.23

3.85

-3.62

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.51

-0.48

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.07

4.52

-4.45

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.14

15.64

-15.50

IVRS vs. AIQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVRS Sharpe Ratio is 0.06, which is lower than the AIQ Sharpe Ratio of 3.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVRS and AIQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IVRSAIQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

3.17

-3.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.85

-0.20

Drawdowns

IVRS vs. AIQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVRS drawdown since its inception was -31.43%, smaller than the maximum AIQ drawdown of -44.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVRS and AIQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVRSAIQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.43%

-44.66%

+13.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.43%

-16.47%

-14.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.43%

-26.35%

-5.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.88%

0.00%

-16.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.79%

-9.80%

+4.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.51%

4.76%

+9.75%

Volatility

IVRS vs. AIQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) is 5.32%, while Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) has a volatility of 8.26%. This indicates that IVRS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVRSAIQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.32%

8.26%

-2.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.46%

18.39%

+0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.74%

23.00%

-1.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.47%

25.33%

-4.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.47%

25.50%

-5.03%

IVRS vs. AIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVRS has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than AIQ's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

IVRS vs. AIQ - Dividend Comparison

IVRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.15%, more than AIQ's 0.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AIQ
Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF
0.13%0.18%0.14%0.16%0.56%0.15%0.50%0.51%0.51%
IVRS
iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF
8.15%7.88%6.65%0.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IVRS and AIQ have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIQ has higher volatility (8.26%) compared to IVRS (5.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVRS dropped -31.43% vs AIQ's -44.66%.

On 3-year performance, AIQ leads with 38.15% vs 10.28% for IVRS. On fees, IVRS is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, IVRS has been the lower-risk option at 5.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, AIQ has performed better with a 38.15% return vs 10.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVRS is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for AIQ.

IVRS has the higher dividend yield at 8.15%, compared with 0.13% for AIQ.

IVRS tracks Morningstar Global Metaverse & Virtual Interaction Select Index - Benchmark TR Net, while AIQ tracks Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IVRS and 0.68% for AIQ.

AIQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVRS and AIQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer