IVRS vs. AIQ
IVRS (iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF) and AIQ (Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVRS is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Global Metaverse & Virtual Interaction Select Index - Benchmark TR Net, while AIQ is a Artificial Intelligence fund tracking the Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IVRS returned 5.18%/yr vs 26.21%/yr for AIQ. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. IVRS charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for AIQ.
Performance
IVRS vs. AIQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVRS achieves a -9.04% return, which is significantly lower than AIQ's 15.79% return.
IVRS
- 1D
- -2.59%
- 1M
- -1.49%
- 6M
- -5.51%
- YTD
- -9.04%
- 1Y
- -13.44%
- 3Y*
- 5.18%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.50%
AIQ
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.79%
- 6M
- 13.32%
- YTD
- 15.79%
- 1Y
- 35.59%
- 3Y*
- 26.21%
- 5Y*
- 14.37%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 18.51%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $120.56M | $130.50M | $165.49M | |
| $45.88K | $34.78K | $21.77K |
IVRS vs. AIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IVRS iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF | -9.04% | 12.75% | 7.40% | 28.15% |
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF | 15.79% | 31.89% | 24.11% | 30.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVRS and AIQ is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2023 | 0.83 |
The correlation between IVRS and AIQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
IVRS vs. AIQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVRS
AIQ
Communication Services
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
IVRS
AIQ
Technology
IVRS
AIQ
Financial Services
IVRS
AIQ
Consumer Cyclical
IVRS
AIQ
Basic Materials
IVRS
-
AIQ
-
Consumer Defensive
IVRS
-
AIQ
-
Energy
IVRS
-
AIQ
-
Healthcare
IVRS
-
AIQ
Industrials
IVRS
-
AIQ
Real Estate
IVRS
-
AIQ
-
Utilities
IVRS
-
AIQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVRS vs. AIQ — Risk / Return Rank
IVRS
AIQ
IVRS vs. AIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) and Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IVRS | AIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.20 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.49 | 1.60 | -2.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.92 | 4.82 | -5.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IVRS vs. AIQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVRS drawdown since its inception was -31.43%, smaller than the maximum AIQ drawdown of -44.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVRS and AIQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVRS | AIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.43% | -44.66% | +13.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.43% | -20.19% | -11.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.43% | -26.35% | -5.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -44.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.75% | -16.04% | -5.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.49% | -9.82% | +3.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.74% | 6.71% | +10.03% |
Volatility
IVRS vs. AIQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) is 7.66%, while Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) has a volatility of 10.41%. This indicates that IVRS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVRS | AIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.66% | 10.41% | -2.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.23% | 24.84% | -4.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.89% | 28.57% | -4.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.86% | 26.42% | -5.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.86% | 25.98% | -5.12% |
IVRS vs. AIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVRS has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than AIQ's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVRS vs. AIQ - Dividend Comparison
IVRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.80%, more than AIQ's 0.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF | 0.08% | 0.18% | 0.14% | 0.16% | 0.56% | 0.15% | 0.50% | 0.51% | 0.51% |
IVRS iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF | 8.80% | 7.88% | 6.65% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVRS and AIQ have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AIQ has higher volatility (10.41%) compared to IVRS (7.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVRS dropped -31.43% vs AIQ's -44.66%.
On 3-year performance, AIQ leads with 26.21% vs 5.18% for IVRS. On fees, IVRS is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, IVRS has been the lower-risk option at 7.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, AIQ has performed better with a 26.21% return vs 5.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVRS is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for AIQ.
IVRS has the higher dividend yield at 8.80%, compared with 0.08% for AIQ.
IVRS is categorized as Technology Equities, while AIQ is Artificial Intelligence. IVRS tracks Morningstar Global Metaverse & Virtual Interaction Select Index - Benchmark TR Net, while AIQ tracks Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IVRS and 0.68% for AIQ.
AIQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVRS and AIQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer