IVRS vs. VUG
IVRS (iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF) and VUG (Vanguard Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVRS is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Global Metaverse & Virtual Interaction Select Index - Benchmark TR Net, while VUG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IVRS returned 5.18%/yr vs 21.19%/yr for VUG. Their 0.80 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. IVRS charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VUG.
Performance
IVRS vs. VUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVRS achieves a -9.04% return, which is significantly lower than VUG's 5.02% return.
IVRS
- 1D
- -2.59%
- 1M
- -1.49%
- 6M
- -5.51%
- YTD
- -9.04%
- 1Y
- -13.44%
- 3Y*
- 5.18%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.50%
VUG
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- -0.35%
- 6M
- 6.39%
- YTD
- 5.02%
- 1Y
- 15.36%
- 3Y*
- 21.19%
- 5Y*
- 12.16%
- 10Y*
- 17.38%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.08%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $45.88K | $34.78K | $21.77K | |
| $556.11M | $661.72M | $650.91M |
IVRS vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IVRS iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF | -9.04% | 12.75% | 7.40% | 28.15% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 5.02% | 19.40% | 32.69% | 27.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVRS and VUG is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2023 | 0.80 |
The correlation between IVRS and VUG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
IVRS vs. VUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVRS
VUG
Communication Services
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
IVRS
VUG
Technology
IVRS
VUG
Financial Services
IVRS
VUG
Consumer Cyclical
IVRS
VUG
Basic Materials
IVRS
-
VUG
Consumer Defensive
IVRS
-
VUG
Energy
IVRS
-
VUG
Healthcare
IVRS
-
VUG
Industrials
IVRS
-
VUG
Real Estate
IVRS
-
VUG
Utilities
IVRS
-
VUG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVRS vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank
IVRS
VUG
IVRS vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IVRS | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.13 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.49 | 0.78 | -1.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.92 | 2.47 | -3.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IVRS vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVRS drawdown since its inception was -31.43%, smaller than the maximum VUG drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVRS and VUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVRS | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.43% | -50.68% | +19.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.43% | -16.53% | -14.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.43% | -22.85% | -8.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.75% | -5.53% | -16.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.49% | -7.08% | +0.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.74% | 5.20% | +11.54% |
Volatility
IVRS vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison
iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) has a higher volatility of 7.66% compared to Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) at 5.58%. This indicates that IVRS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVRS | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.66% | 5.58% | +2.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.23% | 14.24% | +5.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.89% | 17.74% | +6.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.86% | 22.49% | -1.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.86% | 21.55% | -0.69% |
IVRS vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVRS has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVRS vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison
IVRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.80%, more than VUG's 0.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVRS iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF | 8.80% | 7.88% | 6.65% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 0.40% | 0.41% | 0.47% | 0.58% | 0.70% | 0.48% | 0.66% | 0.95% | 1.32% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVRS and VUG have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IVRS has higher volatility (7.66%) compared to VUG (5.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVRS dropped -31.43% vs VUG's -50.68%.
On 3-year performance, VUG leads with 21.19% vs 5.18% for IVRS. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VUG has been the lower-risk option at 5.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, VUG has performed better with a 21.19% return vs 5.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IVRS.
IVRS has the higher dividend yield at 8.80%, compared with 0.40% for VUG.
IVRS is categorized as Technology Equities, while VUG is Large Cap Growth Equities. IVRS tracks Morningstar Global Metaverse & Virtual Interaction Select Index - Benchmark TR Net, while VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IVRS and 0.03% for VUG.
VUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.72 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVRS and VUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer