PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVRS vs. VUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVRS vs. VUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVRS achieves a -9.04% return, which is significantly lower than VUG's 5.02% return.


IVRS

1D
-2.59%
1M
-1.49%
6M
-5.51%
YTD
-9.04%
1Y
-13.44%
3Y*
5.18%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.50%

VUG

1D
1.10%
1M
-0.35%
6M
6.39%
YTD
5.02%
1Y
15.36%
3Y*
21.19%
5Y*
12.16%
10Y*
17.38%
ALL TIME*
12.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$45.88K$34.78K$21.77K
$556.11M$661.72M$650.91M

IVRS vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IVRS
iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF
-9.04%12.75%7.40%28.15%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
5.02%19.40%32.69%27.73%

Correlation

The correlation between IVRS and VUG is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2023

0.80

The correlation between IVRS and VUG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

IVRS vs. VUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IVRS
VUG

Communication Services

46.3%
15.4%

Technology

31.8%
56.2%

Financial Services

17.9%
3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

4.0%
11.5%

Basic Materials

-

0.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

1.4%

Energy

-

0.3%

Healthcare

-

4.7%

Industrials

-

5.3%

Real Estate

-

1.0%

Utilities

-

0.7%

Communication Services

IVRS
46.3%
VUG
15.4%

Technology

IVRS
31.8%
VUG
56.2%

Financial Services

IVRS
17.9%
VUG
3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

IVRS
4.0%
VUG
11.5%

Basic Materials

IVRS

-

VUG
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

IVRS

-

VUG
1.4%

Energy

IVRS

-

VUG
0.3%

Healthcare

IVRS

-

VUG
4.7%

Industrials

IVRS

-

VUG
5.3%

Real Estate

IVRS

-

VUG
1.0%

Utilities

IVRS

-

VUG
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVRS vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IVRS
IVRS Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
IVRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVRS Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
IVRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVRS Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

VUG
VUG Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IVRS vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IVRSVUGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.13

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.49

0.78

-1.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.92

2.47

-3.39

IVRS vs. VUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVRS Sharpe Ratio is -0.65, which is lower than the VUG Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVRS and VUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IVRS vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVRS drawdown since its inception was -31.43%, smaller than the maximum VUG drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVRS and VUG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVRSVUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.43%

-50.68%

+19.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.43%

-16.53%

-14.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.43%

-22.85%

-8.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.75%

-5.53%

-16.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.49%

-7.08%

+0.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.74%

5.20%

+11.54%

Volatility

IVRS vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison

iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) has a higher volatility of 7.66% compared to Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) at 5.58%. This indicates that IVRS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVRSVUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.66%

5.58%

+2.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.23%

14.24%

+5.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.89%

17.74%

+6.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.86%

22.49%

-1.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.86%

21.55%

-0.69%

IVRS vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVRS has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

IVRS vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison

IVRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.80%, more than VUG's 0.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVRS
iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF
8.80%7.88%6.65%0.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.40%0.41%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


IVRS and VUG have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IVRS has higher volatility (7.66%) compared to VUG (5.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVRS dropped -31.43% vs VUG's -50.68%.

On 3-year performance, VUG leads with 21.19% vs 5.18% for IVRS. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VUG has been the lower-risk option at 5.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, VUG has performed better with a 21.19% return vs 5.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IVRS.

IVRS has the higher dividend yield at 8.80%, compared with 0.40% for VUG.

IVRS is categorized as Technology Equities, while VUG is Large Cap Growth Equities. IVRS tracks Morningstar Global Metaverse & Virtual Interaction Select Index - Benchmark TR Net, while VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IVRS and 0.03% for VUG.

VUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.72 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVRS and VUG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer