PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVRS vs. IBOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IVRS vs. IBOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) and VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IVRS vs. IBOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IVRS
iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF
-16.63%12.75%7.40%23.52%
IBOT
VanEck Robotics ETF
0.97%28.57%6.39%18.90%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVRS achieves a -16.63% return, which is significantly lower than IBOT's 0.97% return.


IVRS

1D
4.17%
1M
-6.08%
YTD
-16.63%
6M
-27.67%
1Y
-4.87%
3Y*
7.32%
5Y*
10Y*

IBOT

1D
4.22%
1M
-12.19%
YTD
0.97%
6M
6.86%
1Y
35.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IVRS vs. IBOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IVRS and IBOT have an expense ratio of 0.47%.


Return for Risk

IVRS vs. IBOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVRS
IVRS Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
IVRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVRS Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
IVRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVRS Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

IBOT
IBOT Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
IBOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBOT Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
IBOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBOT Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVRS vs. IBOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) and VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IVRSIBOTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.20

1.40

-1.60

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.11

2.02

-2.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.28

-0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.20

2.03

-2.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.53

8.12

-8.66

IVRS vs. IBOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVRS Sharpe Ratio is -0.20, which is lower than the IBOT Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVRS and IBOT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IVRSIBOTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

1.40

-1.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.84

-0.41

Correlation

The correlation between IVRS and IBOT is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

IVRS vs. IBOT - Dividend Comparison

IVRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.45%, more than IBOT's 0.38% yield.


TTM202520242023
IVRS
iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF
9.45%7.88%6.65%0.48%
IBOT
VanEck Robotics ETF
0.38%0.38%2.81%2.06%

Drawdowns

IVRS vs. IBOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVRS drawdown since its inception was -31.43%, which is greater than IBOT's maximum drawdown of -25.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVRS and IBOT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IVRSIBOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.43%

-25.39%

-6.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.43%

-16.74%

-14.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.28%

-13.23%

-15.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.97%

-5.18%

+0.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.73%

4.19%

+7.54%

Volatility

IVRS vs. IBOT - Volatility Comparison

iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) and VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT) have volatilities of 9.28% and 9.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IVRSIBOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.28%

9.33%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.66%

16.61%

+1.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.82%

25.61%

-0.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.37%

21.78%

-1.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.37%

21.78%

-1.41%