IVRS vs. ESPO
IVRS (iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF) and ESPO (VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVRS is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Global Metaverse & Virtual Interaction Select Index - Benchmark TR Net, while ESPO is a Gaming fund tracking the MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IVRS returned 5.18%/yr vs 18.46%/yr for ESPO. Their correlation of 0.80 means they have usually moved in the same direction. IVRS charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for ESPO.
Performance
IVRS vs. ESPO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IVRS having a -9.04% return and ESPO slightly lower at -9.09%.
IVRS
- 1D
- -2.59%
- 1M
- -1.49%
- 6M
- -5.51%
- YTD
- -9.04%
- 1Y
- -13.44%
- 3Y*
- 5.18%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.50%
ESPO
- 1D
- -3.16%
- 1M
- 2.45%
- 6M
- -5.98%
- YTD
- -9.09%
- 1Y
- -10.16%
- 3Y*
- 18.46%
- 5Y*
- 8.32%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.59%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.98M | $1.50M | $1.55M | |
| $45.88K | $34.78K | $21.77K |
IVRS vs. ESPO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IVRS iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF | -9.04% | 12.75% | 7.40% | 28.15% |
ESPO VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF | -9.09% | 25.79% | 47.61% | 14.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVRS and ESPO is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2023 | 0.80 |
The correlation between IVRS and ESPO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
IVRS vs. ESPO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVRS
ESPO
Communication Services
Technology
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
IVRS
ESPO
Technology
IVRS
ESPO
Financial Services
IVRS
ESPO
-
Consumer Cyclical
IVRS
ESPO
Basic Materials
IVRS
-
ESPO
-
Consumer Defensive
IVRS
-
ESPO
-
Energy
IVRS
-
ESPO
-
Healthcare
IVRS
-
ESPO
-
Industrials
IVRS
-
ESPO
-
Real Estate
IVRS
-
ESPO
-
Utilities
IVRS
-
ESPO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVRS vs. ESPO — Risk / Return Rank
IVRS
ESPO
IVRS vs. ESPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) and VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IVRS | ESPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 0.92 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.49 | -0.39 | -0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.92 | -0.62 | -0.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IVRS vs. ESPO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVRS drawdown since its inception was -31.43%, smaller than the maximum ESPO drawdown of -50.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVRS and ESPO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVRS | ESPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.43% | -50.99% | +19.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.43% | -29.43% | -2.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.43% | -29.43% | -2.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -48.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.75% | -22.03% | +0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.49% | -15.23% | +8.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.74% | 18.32% | -1.58% |
Volatility
IVRS vs. ESPO - Volatility Comparison
iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) has a higher volatility of 7.66% compared to VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) at 6.66%. This indicates that IVRS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESPO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVRS | ESPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.66% | 6.66% | +1.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.23% | 16.07% | +4.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.89% | 19.65% | +4.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.86% | 25.12% | -4.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.86% | 25.65% | -4.79% |
IVRS vs. ESPO - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVRS has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than ESPO's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVRS vs. ESPO - Dividend Comparison
IVRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.80%, more than ESPO's 1.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPO VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF | 1.37% | 1.24% | 0.44% | 0.96% | 0.91% | 3.36% | 0.12% | 0.22% | 0.04% |
IVRS iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF | 8.80% | 7.88% | 6.65% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVRS and ESPO have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IVRS has higher volatility (7.66%) compared to ESPO (6.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVRS dropped -31.43% vs ESPO's -50.99%.
On 3-year performance, ESPO leads with 18.46% vs 5.18% for IVRS. On fees, IVRS is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, ESPO has been the lower-risk option at 6.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ESPO has performed better with a 18.46% return vs 5.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVRS is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ESPO.
IVRS has the higher dividend yield at 8.80%, compared with 1.37% for ESPO.
IVRS is categorized as Technology Equities, while ESPO is Gaming. IVRS tracks Morningstar Global Metaverse & Virtual Interaction Select Index - Benchmark TR Net, while ESPO tracks MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IVRS and 0.55% for ESPO.
ESPO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.58 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVRS and ESPO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer