IVRS vs. VGT
IVRS (iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF) and VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - IVRS tracks the Morningstar Global Metaverse & Virtual Interaction Select Index - Benchmark TR Net while VGT tracks the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IVRS returned 7.73%/yr vs 29.10%/yr for VGT. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. IVRS charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VGT.
Performance
IVRS vs. VGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVRS achieves a -7.07% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 22.47% return.
IVRS
- 1D
- 2.16%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- 6M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- -7.07%
- 1Y
- -11.56%
- 3Y*
- 7.73%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.16%
VGT
- 1D
- 1.76%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- 6M
- 22.59%
- YTD
- 22.47%
- 1Y
- 37.19%
- 3Y*
- 29.10%
- 5Y*
- 18.09%
- 10Y*
- 24.01%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.92%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $45.64K | $34.99K | $21.63K | |
| $454.00M | $507.98M | $575.23M |
IVRS vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IVRS iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF | -7.07% | 12.75% | 7.40% | 28.15% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 22.47% | 21.77% | 29.30% | 31.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVRS and VGT is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2023 | 0.78 |
The correlation between IVRS and VGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
IVRS vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVRS
VGT
Communication Services
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
IVRS
VGT
Technology
IVRS
VGT
Financial Services
IVRS
VGT
Consumer Cyclical
IVRS
VGT
Basic Materials
IVRS
-
VGT
Consumer Defensive
IVRS
-
VGT
-
Energy
IVRS
-
VGT
Healthcare
IVRS
-
VGT
Industrials
IVRS
-
VGT
Real Estate
IVRS
-
VGT
-
Utilities
IVRS
-
VGT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVRS vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank
IVRS
VGT
IVRS vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IVRS | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.26 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.37 | 2.28 | -2.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.69 | 6.12 | -6.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IVRS vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVRS drawdown since its inception was -31.43%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVRS and VGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVRS | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.43% | -54.63% | +23.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.43% | -16.40% | -15.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.43% | -27.23% | -4.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.06% | -8.34% | -11.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.51% | -7.95% | +1.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.79% | 6.09% | +10.70% |
Volatility
IVRS vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison
iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) have volatilities of 7.97% and 8.34%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVRS | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.97% | 8.34% | -0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.96% | 20.11% | -0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.89% | 24.25% | -0.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.88% | 25.85% | -4.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.88% | 24.90% | -4.02% |
IVRS vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVRS has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVRS vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison
IVRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.62%, more than VGT's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVRS iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF | 8.62% | 7.88% | 6.65% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.38% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVRS and VGT have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VGT has higher volatility (8.34%) compared to IVRS (7.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVRS dropped -31.43% vs VGT's -54.63%.
On 3-year performance, VGT leads with 29.10% vs 7.73% for IVRS. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, IVRS has been the lower-risk option at 7.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, VGT has performed better with a 29.10% return vs 7.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IVRS.
IVRS has the higher dividend yield at 8.62%, compared with 0.38% for VGT.
IVRS tracks Morningstar Global Metaverse & Virtual Interaction Select Index - Benchmark TR Net, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IVRS and 0.09% for VGT.
VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVRS and VGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer