VGT vs. SMH
VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VGT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VGT returned 25.19%/yr vs 37.49%/yr for SMH. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VGT charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.
Performance
VGT vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VGT achieves a 24.03% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 72.15% return. Over the past 10 years, VGT has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 25.19%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 37.49% annualized return.
VGT
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 2.90%
- YTD
- 24.03%
- 6M
- 24.13%
- 1Y
- 47.99%
- 3Y*
- 29.84%
- 5Y*
- 20.35%
- 10Y*
- 25.19%
SMH
- 1D
- 1.72%
- 1M
- 8.30%
- YTD
- 72.15%
- 6M
- 75.62%
- 1Y
- 136.32%
- 3Y*
- 60.05%
- 5Y*
- 38.42%
- 10Y*
- 37.49%
VGT vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 24.03% | 21.77% | 29.30% | 52.66% | -29.70% | 30.45% | 46.04% | 48.62% | 2.46% | 37.08% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 72.15% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between VGT and SMH is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004 | 0.85 |
The correlation between VGT and SMH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
VGT vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VGT
SMH
Technology
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Energy
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
VGT
SMH
Communication Services
VGT
SMH
-
Financial Services
VGT
SMH
-
Industrials
VGT
SMH
-
Energy
VGT
SMH
-
Consumer Cyclical
VGT
SMH
-
Basic Materials
VGT
SMH
-
Healthcare
VGT
SMH
-
Consumer Defensive
VGT
-
SMH
-
Real Estate
VGT
-
SMH
-
Utilities
VGT
-
SMH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VGT vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
VGT
SMH
VGT vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VGT | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.60 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.94 | 9.18 | -6.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.11 | 33.74 | -24.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VGT vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VGT drawdown since its inception was -54.63%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGT and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VGT | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.63% | -84.96% | +30.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.40% | -14.93% | -1.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.23% | -35.74% | +8.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.07% | -45.30% | +10.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.07% | -45.30% | +10.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.18% | -2.81% | -4.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.95% | -41.04% | +33.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.28% | 4.06% | +1.22% |
Volatility
VGT vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) is 10.00%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 16.25%. This indicates that VGT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VGT | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.00% | 16.25% | -6.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.00% | 27.73% | -9.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.00% | 33.20% | -11.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.40% | 35.47% | -10.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.72% | 32.82% | -8.10% |
VGT vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
VGT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
VGT vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, more than SMH's 0.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.33% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VGT and SMH have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (16.25%) compared to VGT (10.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGT dropped -54.63% vs SMH's -84.96%.
On 10-year performance, SMH leads with 37.49% vs 25.19% for VGT. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VGT has been the lower-risk option at 10.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SMH has performed better with a 37.49% return vs 25.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMH.
VGT has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.18% for SMH.
VGT is categorized as Technology Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VGT and 0.35% for SMH.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.13 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VGT and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer