PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGT vs. VUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VGT vs. VUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGT achieves a 22.48% return, which is significantly higher than VUG's 5.80% return. Over the past 10 years, VGT has outperformed VUG with an annualized return of 24.81%, while VUG has yielded a comparatively lower 17.81% annualized return.


VGT

1D
-6.14%
1M
2.53%
YTD
22.48%
6M
20.33%
1Y
47.86%
3Y*
30.47%
5Y*
20.48%
10Y*
24.81%

VUG

1D
-3.62%
1M
-1.05%
YTD
5.80%
6M
4.57%
1Y
22.71%
3Y*
24.49%
5Y*
14.33%
10Y*
17.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VGT vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
22.48%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%37.08%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
5.80%19.40%32.69%46.83%-33.16%27.35%40.25%37.03%-3.32%27.72%

Correlation

The correlation between VGT and VUG is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004

0.93

The correlation between VGT and VUG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

VGT vs. VUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VGT
VUG

Technology

98.5%
53.5%

Communication Services

0.5%
17.3%

Financial Services

0.5%
4.3%

Industrials

0.4%
3.6%

Energy

0.3%
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

0.1%
12.2%

Basic Materials

0.0%
0.6%

Healthcare

0.0%
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

1.5%

Real Estate

-

1.0%

Utilities

-

0.9%

Technology

VGT
98.5%
VUG
53.5%

Communication Services

VGT
0.5%
VUG
17.3%

Financial Services

VGT
0.5%
VUG
4.3%

Industrials

VGT
0.4%
VUG
3.6%

Energy

VGT
0.3%
VUG
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

VGT
0.1%
VUG
12.2%

Basic Materials

VGT
0.0%
VUG
0.6%

Healthcare

VGT
0.0%
VUG
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

VGT

-

VUG
1.5%

Real Estate

VGT

-

VUG
1.0%

Utilities

VGT

-

VUG
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGT vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

VUG
VUG Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGT vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VGTVUGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.26

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

1.46

+1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.59

5.09

+4.49

VGT vs. VUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGT Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is higher than the VUG Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGT and VUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VGTVUGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

1.48

+0.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.65

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.01

0.83

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.61

+0.05

Drawdowns

VGT vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGT drawdown since its inception was -54.63%, which is greater than VUG's maximum drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGT and VUG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VGTVUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.63%

-50.68%

-3.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.40%

-16.53%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.23%

-22.85%

-4.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.07%

-35.61%

+0.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.07%

-35.61%

+0.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.34%

-4.83%

-3.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.95%

-7.09%

-0.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.15%

4.72%

+0.43%

Volatility

VGT vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a higher volatility of 9.29% compared to Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) at 5.17%. This indicates that VGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VGTVUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.29%

5.17%

+4.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.37%

12.68%

+4.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.51%

16.26%

+5.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.31%

22.27%

+3.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.68%

21.47%

+3.21%

VGT vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VGT vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison

VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than VUG's 0.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.33%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.39%0.41%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, VGT and VUG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VGT has higher volatility (9.29%) compared to VUG (5.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGT dropped -54.63% vs VUG's -50.68%.

On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 24.81% vs 17.81% for VUG. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VUG has been the lower-risk option at 5.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 24.81% return vs 17.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VGT.

VUG has the higher dividend yield at 0.39%, compared with 0.33% for VGT.

VGT is categorized as Technology Equities, while VUG is Large Cap Growth Equities. VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VGT and 0.03% for VUG.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGT and VUG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer