VGT vs. VUG
VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) and VUG (Vanguard Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VGT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while VUG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VGT returned 24.81%/yr vs 17.81%/yr for VUG. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VGT charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VUG.
Performance
VGT vs. VUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VGT achieves a 22.48% return, which is significantly higher than VUG's 5.80% return. Over the past 10 years, VGT has outperformed VUG with an annualized return of 24.81%, while VUG has yielded a comparatively lower 17.81% annualized return.
VGT
- 1D
- -6.14%
- 1M
- 2.53%
- YTD
- 22.48%
- 6M
- 20.33%
- 1Y
- 47.86%
- 3Y*
- 30.47%
- 5Y*
- 20.48%
- 10Y*
- 24.81%
VUG
- 1D
- -3.62%
- 1M
- -1.05%
- YTD
- 5.80%
- 6M
- 4.57%
- 1Y
- 22.71%
- 3Y*
- 24.49%
- 5Y*
- 14.33%
- 10Y*
- 17.81%
VGT vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 22.48% | 21.77% | 29.30% | 52.66% | -29.70% | 30.45% | 46.04% | 48.62% | 2.46% | 37.08% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 5.80% | 19.40% | 32.69% | 46.83% | -33.16% | 27.35% | 40.25% | 37.03% | -3.32% | 27.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between VGT and VUG is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004 | 0.93 |
The correlation between VGT and VUG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
VGT vs. VUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VGT
VUG
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
VGT
VUG
Communication Services
VGT
VUG
Financial Services
VGT
VUG
Industrials
VGT
VUG
Energy
VGT
VUG
Consumer Cyclical
VGT
VUG
Basic Materials
VGT
VUG
Healthcare
VGT
VUG
Consumer Defensive
VGT
-
VUG
Real Estate
VGT
-
VUG
Utilities
VGT
-
VUG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VGT vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank
VGT
VUG
VGT vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VGT | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.26 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | 1.46 | +1.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.59 | 5.09 | +4.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VGT | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | 1.48 | +0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | 0.65 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.01 | 0.83 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.61 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
VGT vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VGT drawdown since its inception was -54.63%, which is greater than VUG's maximum drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGT and VUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VGT | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.63% | -50.68% | -3.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.40% | -16.53% | +0.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.23% | -22.85% | -4.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.07% | -35.61% | +0.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.07% | -35.61% | +0.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.34% | -4.83% | -3.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.95% | -7.09% | -0.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.15% | 4.72% | +0.43% |
Volatility
VGT vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a higher volatility of 9.29% compared to Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) at 5.17%. This indicates that VGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VGT | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.29% | 5.17% | +4.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.37% | 12.68% | +4.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.51% | 16.26% | +5.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.31% | 22.27% | +3.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.68% | 21.47% | +3.21% |
VGT vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
VGT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VGT vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison
VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than VUG's 0.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.33% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 0.39% | 0.41% | 0.47% | 0.58% | 0.70% | 0.48% | 0.66% | 0.95% | 1.32% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, VGT and VUG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VGT has higher volatility (9.29%) compared to VUG (5.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGT dropped -54.63% vs VUG's -50.68%.
On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 24.81% vs 17.81% for VUG. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VUG has been the lower-risk option at 5.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 24.81% return vs 17.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VGT.
VUG has the higher dividend yield at 0.39%, compared with 0.33% for VGT.
VGT is categorized as Technology Equities, while VUG is Large Cap Growth Equities. VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VGT and 0.03% for VUG.
VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VGT and VUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer