VGT vs. QQQ
VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VGT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VGT returned 24.81%/yr vs 21.27%/yr for QQQ. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VGT charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
VGT vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VGT achieves a 22.48% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 14.92% return. Over the past 10 years, VGT has outperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 24.81%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively lower 21.27% annualized return.
VGT
- 1D
- -6.14%
- 1M
- 5.22%
- YTD
- 22.48%
- 6M
- 20.33%
- 1Y
- 49.26%
- 3Y*
- 30.47%
- 5Y*
- 20.48%
- 10Y*
- 24.81%
QQQ
- 1D
- -4.80%
- 1M
- 1.34%
- YTD
- 14.92%
- 6M
- 13.01%
- 1Y
- 35.00%
- 3Y*
- 26.46%
- 5Y*
- 16.70%
- 10Y*
- 21.27%
VGT vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 22.48% | 21.77% | 29.30% | 52.66% | -29.70% | 30.45% | 46.04% | 48.62% | 2.46% | 37.08% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 14.92% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between VGT and QQQ is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004 | 0.95 |
The correlation between VGT and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
VGT vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VGT
QQQ
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
VGT
QQQ
Communication Services
VGT
QQQ
Financial Services
VGT
QQQ
Industrials
VGT
QQQ
Energy
VGT
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
VGT
QQQ
Basic Materials
VGT
QQQ
Healthcare
VGT
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
VGT
-
QQQ
Real Estate
VGT
-
QQQ
Utilities
VGT
-
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VGT vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
VGT
QQQ
VGT vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VGT | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.37 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | 2.94 | +0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.59 | 11.22 | -1.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VGT | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | 2.11 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | 0.75 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.01 | 0.95 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.40 | +0.26 |
Drawdowns
VGT vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VGT drawdown since its inception was -54.63%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGT and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VGT | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.63% | -82.97% | +28.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.40% | -11.96% | -4.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.23% | -22.77% | -4.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.07% | -35.12% | +0.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.07% | -35.12% | +0.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.34% | -5.51% | -2.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.95% | -32.78% | +24.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.15% | 3.13% | +2.02% |
Volatility
VGT vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a higher volatility of 9.29% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 6.68%. This indicates that VGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VGT | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.29% | 6.68% | +2.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.37% | 13.12% | +4.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.51% | 16.69% | +4.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.31% | 22.47% | +2.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.68% | 22.34% | +2.34% |
VGT vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
VGT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VGT vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than QQQ's 0.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.40% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.33% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, VGT and QQQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VGT has higher volatility (9.29%) compared to QQQ (6.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGT dropped -54.63% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 24.81% vs 21.27% for QQQ. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 6.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 24.81% return vs 21.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.40%, compared with 0.33% for VGT.
VGT is categorized as Technology Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VGT and 0.18% for QQQ.
VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VGT and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer