IVRS vs. USL
IVRS (iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF) and USL (United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - IVRS is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Global Metaverse & Virtual Interaction Select Index - Benchmark TR Net, while USL is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IVRS returned 9.46%/yr vs 18.42%/yr for USL. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IVRS charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for USL.
Performance
IVRS vs. USL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVRS achieves a -5.51% return, which is significantly lower than USL's 63.07% return.
IVRS
- 1D
- -2.21%
- 1M
- 1.13%
- YTD
- -5.51%
- 6M
- -8.57%
- 1Y
- -1.11%
- 3Y*
- 9.46%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USL
- 1D
- 1.55%
- 1M
- -1.61%
- YTD
- 63.07%
- 6M
- 59.66%
- 1Y
- 57.86%
- 3Y*
- 18.42%
- 5Y*
- 17.41%
- 10Y*
- 10.91%
IVRS vs. USL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IVRS iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF | -5.51% | 12.75% | 7.40% | 28.15% |
USL United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP | 63.07% | -12.37% | 8.30% | 0.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVRS and USL is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2023 | 0.00 |
The correlation between IVRS and USL shifts across timeframes, from -0.23 (1 year) to 0.00 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IVRS vs. USL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVRS
USL
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
IVRS
USL
-
Communication Services
IVRS
USL
-
Financial Services
IVRS
USL
Consumer Cyclical
IVRS
USL
-
Basic Materials
IVRS
-
USL
-
Consumer Defensive
IVRS
-
USL
-
Energy
IVRS
-
USL
-
Healthcare
IVRS
-
USL
-
Industrials
IVRS
-
USL
-
Real Estate
IVRS
-
USL
-
Utilities
IVRS
-
USL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVRS vs. USL — Risk / Return Rank
IVRS
USL
IVRS vs. USL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IVRS | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.34 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.04 | 3.47 | -3.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.08 | 7.02 | -7.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IVRS | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 | 2.04 | -2.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.01 | +0.60 |
Drawdowns
IVRS vs. USL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVRS drawdown since its inception was -31.43%, smaller than the maximum USL drawdown of -89.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVRS and USL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVRS | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.43% | -89.06% | +57.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.43% | -16.76% | -14.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.43% | -23.33% | -8.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.72% | -38.16% | +19.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.81% | -61.46% | +55.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.55% | 8.27% | +6.28% |
Volatility
IVRS vs. USL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) is 5.53%, while United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL) has a volatility of 10.53%. This indicates that IVRS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVRS | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.53% | 10.53% | -5.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.59% | 23.33% | -4.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.85% | 28.54% | -6.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.49% | 30.08% | -9.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.49% | 32.35% | -11.86% |
IVRS vs. USL - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVRS has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than USL's 0.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVRS vs. USL - Dividend Comparison
IVRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.34%, while USL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IVRS iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF | 8.34% | 7.88% | 6.65% | 0.48% |
USL United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVRS and USL have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USL has higher volatility (10.53%) compared to IVRS (5.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVRS dropped -31.43% vs USL's -89.06%.
On 3-year performance, USL leads with 18.42% vs 9.46% for IVRS. On fees, IVRS is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, IVRS has been the lower-risk option at 5.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, USL has performed better with a 18.42% return vs 9.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVRS is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for USL.
IVRS has the higher dividend yield at 8.34%, compared with 0.00% for USL.
IVRS is categorized as Technology Equities, while USL is Oil & Gas. IVRS tracks Morningstar Global Metaverse & Virtual Interaction Select Index - Benchmark TR Net, while USL tracks 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IVRS and 0.88% for USL.
USL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVRS and USL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer