USL vs. COP
USL (United States 12 Month Oil Fund, LP) is Oil & Gas fund tracking the Equal-Weighted 12-Month NYMEX WTI Crude Oil Futures Contracts, while COP (ConocoPhillips Company) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, USL returned 10.73%/yr vs 14.69%/yr for COP. Their 0.60 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
USL vs. COP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USL achieves a 42.12% return, which is significantly higher than COP's 27.91% return. Over the past 10 years, USL has underperformed COP with an annualized return of 10.73%, while COP has yielded a comparatively higher 14.69% annualized return.
USL
- 1D
- -2.31%
- 1M
- 5.30%
- 6M
- 29.91%
- YTD
- 42.12%
- 1Y
- 30.23%
- 3Y*
- 8.03%
- 5Y*
- 13.78%
- 10Y*
- 10.73%
- ALL TIME*
- -0.35%
COP
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- 12.61%
- 6M
- 14.14%
- YTD
- 27.91%
- 1Y
- 31.23%
- 3Y*
- 4.40%
- 5Y*
- 20.15%
- 10Y*
- 14.69%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.77%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $743.01M | $720.80M | $804.60M | |
| $624.51K | $673.47K | $1.06M |
USL vs. COP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USL United States 12 Month Oil Fund, LP | 42.12% | -12.37% | 8.30% | -1.11% | 27.10% | 62.48% | -25.23% | 28.01% | -14.15% | 2.55% |
COP ConocoPhillips Company | 27.91% | -2.34% | -12.02% | 1.98% | 71.69% | 86.60% | -36.04% | 6.63% | 15.63% | 11.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between USL and COP is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2007 | 0.60 |
The correlation between USL and COP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USL vs. COP — Risk / Return Rank
USL
COP
USL vs. COP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States 12 Month Oil Fund, LP (USL) and ConocoPhillips Company (COP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| USL | COP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.18 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.45 | 1.41 | +0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.98 | 3.51 | +0.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
USL vs. COP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USL drawdown since its inception was -89.06%, which is greater than COP's maximum drawdown of -84.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USL and COP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USL | COP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.06% | -84.55% | -4.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.91% | -22.28% | +1.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.33% | -36.19% | +12.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.82% | -36.19% | +2.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.02% | -70.66% | +4.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.10% | -11.20% | -34.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -61.29% | -25.46% | -35.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.63% | 8.91% | -1.28% |
Volatility
USL vs. COP - Volatility Comparison
United States 12 Month Oil Fund, LP (USL) has a higher volatility of 11.47% compared to ConocoPhillips Company (COP) at 9.19%. This indicates that USL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USL | COP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.47% | 9.19% | +2.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.59% | 22.43% | +3.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.00% | 29.80% | +0.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.37% | 32.67% | -2.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.37% | 37.59% | -5.22% |
Dividends
USL vs. COP - Dividend Comparison
USL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COP ConocoPhillips Company | 2.80% | 3.40% | 3.35% | 3.37% | 4.23% | 2.70% | 4.23% | 2.05% | 1.86% | 1.93% | 1.99% | 6.30% |
USL United States 12 Month Oil Fund, LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USL and COP have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USL has higher volatility (11.47%) compared to COP (9.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USL dropped -89.06% vs COP's -84.55%.
COP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USL and COP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer