IVRS vs. TIME

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

IVRS (iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF) and TIME (Clockwise U.S. Core Equity ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. IVRS is passively managed, while TIME is actively managed. Over the past year, IVRS returned -13.44% vs 16.12% for TIME. Their 0.69 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. IVRS charges 0.47%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for TIME.

Performance

IVRS vs. TIME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) and Clockwise U.S. Core Equity ETF (TIME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVRS achieves a -9.04% return, which is significantly lower than TIME's 6.68% return.

IVRS

• 1D: -2.59%
• 1M: -1.49%
• 6M: -5.51%
• YTD: -9.04%
• 1Y: -13.44%
• 3Y*: 5.18%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.50%

TIME

• 1D: 0.63%
• 1M: 0.10%
• 6M: 6.87%
• YTD: 6.68%
• 1Y: 16.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
IVRS iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF	$45.88K	$34.78K	$21.77K
TIME Clockwise U.S. Core Equity ETF	$50.21K	$44.64K	$109.23K

IVRS vs. TIME - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
IVRS iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF	-9.04%	12.75%	6.98%
TIME Clockwise U.S. Core Equity ETF	6.68%	10.17%	5.94%

Correlation

The correlation between IVRS and TIME is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2024	0.69

The correlation between IVRS and TIME has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

IVRS vs. TIME - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IVRS	TIME
Communication Services	46.3%	15.6%
Technology	31.8%	45.5%
Financial Services	17.9%	3.6%
Consumer Cyclical	4.0%	6.1%
Basic Materials	-	3.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	5.5%
Energy	-	6.8%
Healthcare	-	6.8%
Industrials	-	5.3%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	1.6%

Return for Risk

IVRS vs. TIME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IVRS

IVRS Risk / Return Rank: 5
IVRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
IVRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
IVRS Omega Ratio Rank: 4
IVRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
IVRS Martin Ratio Rank: 5

TIME

TIME Risk / Return Rank: 40
TIME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
TIME Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
TIME Omega Ratio Rank: 42
TIME Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
TIME Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IVRS vs. TIME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) and Clockwise U.S. Core Equity ETF (TIME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IVRS	TIME	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.65	1.10	-1.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.77	1.55	-2.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	1.20	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.49	1.20	-1.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.92	4.09	-5.01

IVRS vs. TIME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVRS Sharpe Ratio is -0.65, which is lower than the TIME Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVRS and TIME, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IVRS vs. TIME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVRS drawdown since its inception was -31.43%, which is greater than TIME's maximum drawdown of -24.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVRS and TIME.

Drawdown Indicators

	IVRS	TIME	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.43%	-24.26%	-7.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.43%	-13.09%	-18.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.43%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.75%	-3.57%	-18.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.49%	-5.44%	-1.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.74%	3.83%	+12.91%

Volatility

IVRS vs. TIME - Volatility Comparison

iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) has a higher volatility of 7.66% compared to Clockwise U.S. Core Equity ETF (TIME) at 3.90%. This indicates that IVRS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TIME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IVRS	TIME	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.66%	3.90%	+3.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.23%	11.44%	+8.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.89%	14.19%	+9.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.86%	17.55%	+3.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.86%	17.55%	+3.31%

IVRS vs. TIME - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVRS has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than TIME's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

IVRS vs. TIME - Dividend Comparison

IVRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.80%, less than TIME's 9.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
IVRS iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF	8.80%	7.88%	6.65%	0.48%
TIME Clockwise U.S. Core Equity ETF	9.39%	10.02%	15.84%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IVRS and TIME in my portfolio?

IVRS and TIME have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IVRS or TIME?

IVRS has higher volatility (7.66%) compared to TIME (3.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVRS dropped -31.43% vs TIME's -24.26%.

Which ETF is better, IVRS or TIME?

On 1-year performance, TIME leads with 16.12% vs -13.44% for IVRS. On fees, IVRS is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, TIME has been the lower-risk option at 3.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IVRS or TIME?

Over the 1-year period, TIME has performed better with a 16.12% return vs -13.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IVRS or TIME?

IVRS is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for TIME.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IVRS or TIME?

TIME has the higher dividend yield at 9.39%, compared with 8.80% for IVRS.

What is the main difference between IVRS and TIME?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Clockwise. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IVRS and 1.00% for TIME.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TIME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.10 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.