PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USL vs. XLE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USL vs. XLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USL achieves a 60.58% return, which is significantly higher than XLE's 32.26% return. Over the past 10 years, USL has outperformed XLE with an annualized return of 10.57%, while XLE has yielded a comparatively lower 9.99% annualized return.


USL

1D
-1.53%
1M
-1.98%
YTD
60.58%
6M
56.11%
1Y
56.55%
3Y*
17.93%
5Y*
17.05%
10Y*
10.57%

XLE

1D
0.07%
1M
-1.18%
YTD
32.26%
6M
29.34%
1Y
47.98%
3Y*
17.74%
5Y*
20.45%
10Y*
9.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USL vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USL
United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP
60.58%-12.37%8.30%-1.11%27.10%62.48%-25.23%28.01%-14.15%2.55%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
32.26%7.88%5.56%-0.63%64.32%53.28%-32.67%11.74%-18.22%-0.89%

Correlation

The correlation between USL and XLE is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2007

0.63

The correlation between USL and XLE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

USL vs. XLE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
USL
XLE

Financial Services

4.5%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

100.0%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

USL
4.5%
XLE

-

Basic Materials

USL

-

XLE

-

Communication Services

USL

-

XLE

-

Consumer Cyclical

USL

-

XLE

-

Consumer Defensive

USL

-

XLE

-

Energy

USL

-

XLE
100.0%

Healthcare

USL

-

XLE

-

Industrials

USL

-

XLE

-

Real Estate

USL

-

XLE

-

Technology

USL

-

XLE

-

Utilities

USL

-

XLE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USL vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USL
USL Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
USL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
USL Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
USL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
USL Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

XLE
XLE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USL vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USLXLEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.38

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

4.00

-0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.85

11.60

-4.74

USL vs. XLE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USL Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the XLE Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USL and XLE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USLXLEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

2.36

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.79

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

0.34

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

0.31

-0.30

Drawdowns

USL vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USL drawdown since its inception was -89.06%, which is greater than XLE's maximum drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USL and XLE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USLXLEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.06%

-71.26%

-17.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.76%

-12.05%

-4.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.33%

-20.14%

-3.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.82%

-26.04%

-7.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.02%

-66.81%

+0.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.10%

-6.09%

-33.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-61.45%

-17.98%

-43.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.27%

4.15%

+4.12%

Volatility

USL vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison

United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL) has a higher volatility of 10.57% compared to State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) at 8.25%. This indicates that USL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USLXLEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.57%

8.25%

+2.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.34%

16.51%

+6.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.59%

20.50%

+8.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.09%

26.01%

+4.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.34%

29.58%

+2.76%

USL vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison

USL has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

USL vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison

USL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
USL
United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.54%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


USL and XLE have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USL has higher volatility (10.57%) compared to XLE (8.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USL dropped -89.06% vs XLE's -71.26%.

On 10-year performance, USL leads with 10.57% vs 9.99% for XLE. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLE has been the lower-risk option at 8.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, USL has performed better with a 10.57% return vs 9.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for USL.

XLE has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 0.00% for USL.

USL is categorized as Oil & Gas, while XLE is Energy Equities. USL tracks 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil, while XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Concierge Technologies and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for USL and 0.08% for XLE.

XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USL and XLE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer