IVRS vs. ARMH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IVRS (iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF) and ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. IVRS is passively managed, while ARMH is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IVRS charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ARMH.

Performance

IVRS vs. ARMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

IVRS

• 1D: -2.21%
• 1M: 1.13%
• YTD: -5.51%
• 6M: -8.57%
• 1Y: -1.11%
• 3Y*: 9.46%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ARMH

• 1D: 2.87%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVRS vs. ARMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
IVRS iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF	-2.11%
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	23.00%

Correlation

The correlation between IVRS and ARMH is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026	0.80

Return for Risk

IVRS vs. ARMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVRS

IVRS Risk / Return Rank: 8
IVRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
IVRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
IVRS Omega Ratio Rank: 8
IVRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
IVRS Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVRS vs. ARMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IVRS	ARMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.05	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.08	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.04	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.08	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IVRS	ARMH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.05	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.61	471,500.14	-471,499.54

Drawdowns

IVRS vs. ARMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVRS drawdown since its inception was -31.43%, which is greater than ARMH's maximum drawdown of -1.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVRS and ARMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	IVRS	ARMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.43%	-1.61%	-29.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.43%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.43%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.72%	0.00%	-18.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.81%	-0.40%	-5.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.55%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IVRS	ARMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.53%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.59%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.85%	113.00%	-91.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.49%	113.00%	-92.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.49%	113.00%	-92.51%

IVRS vs. ARMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVRS has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

IVRS vs. ARMH - Dividend Comparison

IVRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.34%, while ARMH has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IVRS iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF	8.34%	7.88%	6.65%	0.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IVRS and ARMH in my portfolio?

IVRS and ARMH have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IVRS or ARMH?

On fees, ARMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IVRS or ARMH?

ARMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IVRS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IVRS or ARMH?

IVRS has the higher dividend yield at 8.34%, compared with 0.00% for ARMH.

What is the main difference between IVRS and ARMH?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IVRS and 0.19% for ARMH.