PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISHP vs. CIBR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISHP vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF (ISHP) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISHP achieves a -10.97% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR's 32.24% return.


ISHP

1D
-0.10%
1M
-1.59%
YTD
-10.97%
6M
-10.01%
1Y
-7.50%
3Y*
11.42%
5Y*
1.58%
10Y*

CIBR

1D
0.18%
1M
37.17%
YTD
32.24%
6M
29.33%
1Y
30.75%
3Y*
29.54%
5Y*
17.20%
10Y*
18.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISHP vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ISHP
First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF
-10.97%12.27%24.17%22.24%-33.79%30.09%15.33%19.74%-2.04%7.66%
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
32.24%13.06%18.21%39.71%-26.46%19.67%50.53%28.52%1.47%18.61%

Correlation

The correlation between ISHP and CIBR is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2016

0.49

The correlation between ISHP and CIBR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

ISHP vs. CIBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ISHP
CIBR

Consumer Cyclical

40.9%

-

Communication Services

24.5%
2.6%

Industrials

13.1%
3.5%

Technology

10.2%
94.0%

Real Estate

4.9%

-

Healthcare

3.0%

-

Financial Services

1.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.6%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Energy

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

ISHP
40.9%
CIBR

-

Communication Services

ISHP
24.5%
CIBR
2.6%

Industrials

ISHP
13.1%
CIBR
3.5%

Technology

ISHP
10.2%
CIBR
94.0%

Real Estate

ISHP
4.9%
CIBR

-

Healthcare

ISHP
3.0%
CIBR

-

Financial Services

ISHP
1.8%
CIBR

-

Consumer Defensive

ISHP
1.6%
CIBR

-

Basic Materials

ISHP

-

CIBR

-

Energy

ISHP

-

CIBR

-

Utilities

ISHP

-

CIBR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISHP vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISHP
ISHP Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
ISHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISHP Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
ISHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISHP Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

CIBR
CIBR Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
CIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
CIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISHP vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF (ISHP) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ISHPCIBRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.44

1.27

-1.71

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.50

1.82

-2.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.23

-0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.27

1.46

-1.73

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.59

3.47

-4.06

ISHP vs. CIBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISHP Sharpe Ratio is -0.44, which is lower than the CIBR Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISHP and CIBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ISHPCIBRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.44

1.27

-1.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

0.69

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.68

-0.38

Drawdowns

ISHP vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISHP drawdown since its inception was -47.57%, which is greater than CIBR's maximum drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISHP and CIBR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISHPCIBRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.57%

-33.89%

-13.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.75%

-21.99%

-2.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.75%

-21.99%

-2.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.57%

-33.89%

-13.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.21%

0.00%

-18.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.65%

-8.66%

-3.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.39%

9.25%

+2.14%

Volatility

ISHP vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF (ISHP) is 3.98%, while First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a volatility of 9.99%. This indicates that ISHP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISHPCIBRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.98%

9.99%

-6.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.27%

20.72%

-7.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.13%

24.34%

-7.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.29%

24.93%

+2.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.09%

23.58%

+0.51%

ISHP vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ISHP and CIBR have an expense ratio of 0.60%.


Dividends

ISHP vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison

ISHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, more than CIBR's 0.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
0.43%0.42%0.29%0.42%0.31%0.59%1.10%0.23%0.23%0.10%0.77%0.58%
ISHP
First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF
1.50%1.34%1.02%1.58%0.76%0.53%0.82%1.16%0.89%1.65%0.23%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ISHP and CIBR have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CIBR has higher volatility (9.99%) compared to ISHP (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISHP dropped -47.57% vs CIBR's -33.89%.

On 5-year performance, CIBR leads with 17.20% vs 1.58% for ISHP. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, ISHP has been the lower-risk option at 3.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, CIBR has performed better with a 17.20% return vs 1.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ISHP and CIBR have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.

ISHP has the higher dividend yield at 1.50%, compared with 0.43% for CIBR.

ISHP is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while CIBR is Technology Equities. ISHP tracks S-Network Global E-Commerce Index, while CIBR tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index.

CIBR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISHP and CIBR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer