ISHP vs. XLY
ISHP (First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF) and XLY (Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - ISHP tracks the S-Network Global E-Commerce Index while XLY tracks the Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ISHP returned 1.58%/yr vs 5.94%/yr for XLY. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ISHP charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for XLY.
Performance
ISHP vs. XLY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISHP achieves a -11.94% return, which is significantly lower than XLY's -2.43% return.
ISHP
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 2.21%
- 6M
- -15.90%
- YTD
- -11.94%
- 1Y
- -11.94%
- 3Y*
- 8.13%
- 5Y*
- 1.58%
- 10Y*
- —
XLY
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- 6M
- -6.44%
- YTD
- -2.43%
- 1Y
- 5.62%
- 3Y*
- 10.78%
- 5Y*
- 5.94%
- 10Y*
- 12.26%
ISHP vs. XLY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISHP First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF | -11.94% | 12.27% | 24.17% | 22.24% | -33.79% | 30.09% | 15.33% | 19.74% | -2.04% | 7.66% |
XLY Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund | -2.43% | 7.37% | 26.51% | 39.64% | -36.27% | 27.93% | 29.63% | 28.39% | 1.58% | 22.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISHP and XLY is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2016 | 0.62 |
The correlation between ISHP and XLY shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (all time) to 0.72 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ISHP vs. XLY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ISHP
XLY
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Technology
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
ISHP
XLY
Communication Services
ISHP
XLY
Industrials
ISHP
XLY
Technology
ISHP
XLY
Real Estate
ISHP
XLY
-
Healthcare
ISHP
XLY
-
Financial Services
ISHP
XLY
-
Consumer Defensive
ISHP
XLY
-
Basic Materials
ISHP
-
XLY
-
Energy
ISHP
-
XLY
-
Utilities
ISHP
-
XLY
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISHP vs. XLY — Risk / Return Rank
ISHP
XLY
ISHP vs. XLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF (ISHP) and Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ISHP | XLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.06 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.48 | 0.38 | -0.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.90 | 1.09 | -1.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ISHP vs. XLY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISHP drawdown since its inception was -47.57%, smaller than the maximum XLY drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISHP and XLY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISHP | XLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.57% | -59.05% | +11.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.75% | -14.98% | -9.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.75% | -26.01% | +1.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.57% | -39.67% | -7.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.10% | -6.44% | -12.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.74% | -9.54% | -3.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.26% | 5.17% | +8.09% |
Volatility
ISHP vs. XLY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF (ISHP) is 5.21%, while Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) has a volatility of 6.43%. This indicates that ISHP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISHP | XLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.21% | 6.43% | -1.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.24% | 14.15% | +0.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.76% | 18.71% | -0.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.27% | 23.96% | +3.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.04% | 22.09% | +1.95% |
ISHP vs. XLY - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISHP has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XLY's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISHP vs. XLY - Dividend Comparison
ISHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, more than XLY's 0.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISHP First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF | 1.18% | 1.34% | 1.02% | 1.58% | 0.76% | 0.53% | 0.82% | 1.16% | 0.89% | 1.65% | 0.23% | 0.00% |
XLY Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund | 0.78% | 0.79% | 0.72% | 0.78% | 1.00% | 0.53% | 0.82% | 1.28% | 1.34% | 1.20% | 1.71% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISHP and XLY have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLY has higher volatility (6.43%) compared to ISHP (5.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISHP dropped -47.57% vs XLY's -59.05%.
On 5-year performance, XLY leads with 5.94% vs 1.58% for ISHP. On fees, XLY is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, ISHP has been the lower-risk option at 5.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XLY has performed better with a 5.94% return vs 1.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLY is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ISHP.
ISHP has the higher dividend yield at 1.18%, compared with 0.78% for XLY.
ISHP tracks S-Network Global E-Commerce Index, while XLY tracks Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ISHP and 0.13% for XLY.
XLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.30 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ISHP and XLY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer