Correlation
The correlation between ISHP and FLCH is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
ISHP vs. FLCH
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF (ISHP) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH).
ISHP and FLCH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ISHP is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the S-Network Global E-Commerce Index. It was launched on Sep 20, 2016. FLCH is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the FTSE China RIC Capped Index. It was launched on Nov 2, 2017. Both ISHP and FLCH are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ISHP or FLCH.
Performance
ISHP vs. FLCH - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
ISHP:
1.16
FLCH:
0.64
ISHP:
1.71
FLCH:
1.07
ISHP:
1.23
FLCH:
1.15
ISHP:
1.06
FLCH:
0.37
ISHP:
4.90
FLCH:
1.60
ISHP:
5.36%
FLCH:
12.80%
ISHP:
22.97%
FLCH:
33.92%
ISHP:
-47.57%
FLCH:
-62.09%
ISHP:
-4.83%
FLCH:
-40.09%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISHP achieves a 7.20% return, which is significantly lower than FLCH's 12.66% return.
ISHP
7.20%
4.44%
1.91%
26.53%
15.58%
11.64%
N/A
FLCH
12.66%
2.27%
13.19%
23.70%
3.46%
-0.44%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ISHP vs. FLCH - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISHP has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ISHP vs. FLCH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ISHP
FLCH
ISHP vs. FLCH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF (ISHP) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
ISHP vs. FLCH - Dividend Comparison
ISHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than FLCH's 2.55% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISHP First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF | 0.95% | 1.02% | 1.58% | 0.76% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.16% | 0.89% | 1.64% | 0.23% |
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | 2.55% | 2.88% | 3.46% | 2.69% | 1.49% | 0.91% | 1.98% | 1.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ISHP vs. FLCH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISHP drawdown since its inception was -47.57%, smaller than the maximum FLCH drawdown of -62.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISHP and FLCH.
Loading data...
Volatility
ISHP vs. FLCH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF (ISHP) is 5.79%, while Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) has a volatility of 6.53%. This indicates that ISHP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLCH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...