ISHP vs. EBIZ
ISHP (First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF) and EBIZ (Global X E-commerce ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - ISHP tracks the S-Network Global E-Commerce Index while EBIZ tracks the Solactive E-commerce Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ISHP returned 1.58%/yr vs -3.19%/yr for EBIZ. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ISHP charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for EBIZ.
Performance
ISHP vs. EBIZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISHP achieves a -10.97% return, which is significantly higher than EBIZ's -13.52% return.
ISHP
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -1.59%
- YTD
- -10.97%
- 6M
- -10.01%
- 1Y
- -7.50%
- 3Y*
- 11.42%
- 5Y*
- 1.58%
- 10Y*
- —
EBIZ
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- -1.07%
- YTD
- -13.52%
- 6M
- -13.97%
- 1Y
- -6.24%
- 3Y*
- 17.97%
- 5Y*
- -3.19%
- 10Y*
- —
ISHP vs. EBIZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISHP First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF | -10.97% | 12.27% | 24.17% | 22.24% | -33.79% | 30.09% | 15.33% | 19.74% | -8.68% |
EBIZ Global X E-commerce ETF | -13.52% | 17.74% | 31.26% | 30.88% | -40.96% | -13.26% | 74.39% | 32.76% | -11.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISHP and EBIZ is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2018 | 0.71 |
The correlation between ISHP and EBIZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (all time) to 0.88 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ISHP vs. EBIZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ISHP
EBIZ
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Technology
Real Estate
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
ISHP
EBIZ
Communication Services
ISHP
EBIZ
Industrials
ISHP
EBIZ
Technology
ISHP
EBIZ
Real Estate
ISHP
EBIZ
Healthcare
ISHP
EBIZ
Financial Services
ISHP
EBIZ
Consumer Defensive
ISHP
EBIZ
-
Basic Materials
ISHP
-
EBIZ
-
Energy
ISHP
-
EBIZ
-
Utilities
ISHP
-
EBIZ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISHP vs. EBIZ — Risk / Return Rank
ISHP
EBIZ
ISHP vs. EBIZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF (ISHP) and Global X E-commerce ETF (EBIZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ISHP | EBIZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | -0.32 | -0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.50 | -0.31 | -0.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 0.96 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.27 | -0.19 | -0.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.59 | -0.39 | -0.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ISHP | EBIZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.44 | -0.32 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | -0.11 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
ISHP vs. EBIZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISHP drawdown since its inception was -47.57%, smaller than the maximum EBIZ drawdown of -61.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISHP and EBIZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISHP | EBIZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.57% | -61.58% | +14.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.75% | -27.73% | +2.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.75% | -27.73% | +2.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.57% | -58.21% | +10.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.21% | -24.21% | +6.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.65% | -24.33% | +11.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.39% | 13.33% | -1.94% |
Volatility
ISHP vs. EBIZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF (ISHP) is 3.98%, while Global X E-commerce ETF (EBIZ) has a volatility of 5.00%. This indicates that ISHP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EBIZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISHP | EBIZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.98% | 5.00% | -1.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.27% | 14.88% | -1.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.13% | 19.75% | -2.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.29% | 28.90% | -1.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.09% | 28.68% | -4.59% |
ISHP vs. EBIZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISHP has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than EBIZ's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISHP vs. EBIZ - Dividend Comparison
ISHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, more than EBIZ's 0.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EBIZ Global X E-commerce ETF | 0.59% | 0.51% | 0.23% | 0.00% | 0.10% | 0.57% | 0.84% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ISHP First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF | 1.50% | 1.34% | 1.02% | 1.58% | 0.76% | 0.53% | 0.82% | 1.16% | 0.89% | 1.65% | 0.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISHP and EBIZ have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EBIZ has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to ISHP (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISHP dropped -47.57% vs EBIZ's -61.58%.
On 5-year performance, ISHP leads with 1.58% vs -3.19% for EBIZ. On fees, EBIZ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, ISHP has been the lower-risk option at 3.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ISHP has performed better with a 1.58% return vs -3.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EBIZ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ISHP.
ISHP has the higher dividend yield at 1.50%, compared with 0.59% for EBIZ.
ISHP tracks S-Network Global E-Commerce Index, while EBIZ tracks Solactive E-commerce Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ISHP and 0.50% for EBIZ.
EBIZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.32 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ISHP and EBIZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer