IMMR vs. REG
IMMR (Immersion Corporation) and REG (Regency Centers Corporation) are both stocks. IMMR operates in Software - Application (Technology), while REG operates in REIT - Retail (Real Estate). Over the past 10 years, IMMR returned 1.36%/yr vs 4.12%/yr for REG. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IMMR vs. REG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IMMR achieves a -1.57% return, which is significantly lower than REG's 18.54% return. Over the past 10 years, IMMR has underperformed REG with an annualized return of 1.36%, while REG has yielded a comparatively higher 4.12% annualized return.
IMMR
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- 6.34%
- YTD
- -1.57%
- 6M
- -3.13%
- 1Y
- -11.15%
- 3Y*
- -2.27%
- 5Y*
- -3.44%
- 10Y*
- 1.36%
REG
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 6.55%
- YTD
- 18.54%
- 6M
- 22.12%
- 1Y
- 18.96%
- 3Y*
- 14.45%
- 5Y*
- 7.74%
- 10Y*
- 4.12%
IMMR vs. REG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMMR Immersion Corporation | -1.57% | -18.30% | 26.47% | 3.43% | 23.12% | -49.42% | 51.95% | -17.08% | 26.91% | -33.58% |
REG Regency Centers Corporation | 18.54% | -2.78% | 14.90% | 11.85% | -13.59% | 71.41% | -23.86% | 11.43% | -12.00% | 3.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMMR and REG is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 1999 | 0.21 |
The correlation between IMMR and REG shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.22 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
IMMR:
$1.47B
REG:
$1.70B
IMMR:
$409.86M
REG:
$814.76M
IMMR:
$188.76M
REG:
$1.12B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IMMR vs. REG — Risk / Return Rank
IMMR
REG
IMMR vs. REG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Immersion Corporation (IMMR) and Regency Centers Corporation (REG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IMMR | REG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.20 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.37 | 2.16 | -2.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.68 | 5.27 | -5.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IMMR vs. REG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMMR drawdown since its inception was -98.66%, which is greater than REG's maximum drawdown of -73.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMMR and REG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IMMR | REG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.66% | -73.37% | -25.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.86% | -8.17% | -22.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.90% | -15.10% | -41.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.90% | -30.09% | -26.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -74.29% | -57.02% | -17.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -89.85% | -0.10% | -89.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -88.20% | -16.17% | -72.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.89% | 3.35% | +13.54% |
Volatility
IMMR vs. REG - Volatility Comparison
Immersion Corporation (IMMR) has a higher volatility of 12.99% compared to Regency Centers Corporation (REG) at 4.45%. This indicates that IMMR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than REG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IMMR | REG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.99% | 4.45% | +8.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.57% | 11.10% | +16.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.99% | 15.90% | +24.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.85% | 22.39% | +23.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.32% | 29.88% | +21.44% |
Dividends
IMMR vs. REG - Dividend Comparison
IMMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, which matches REG's 3.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMMR Immersion Corporation | 3.67% | 5.59% | 2.06% | 3.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
REG Regency Centers Corporation | 3.70% | 4.16% | 3.67% | 3.91% | 4.04% | 3.20% | 5.22% | 3.71% | 3.78% | 3.04% | 2.90% | 2.85% |
Financials
IMMR vs. REG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Immersion Corporation and Regency Centers Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
IMMR and REG have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IMMR has higher volatility (12.99%) compared to REG (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IMMR dropped -98.66% vs REG's -73.37%.
REG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IMMR and REG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer