PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDYV vs. VOE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDYV vs. VOE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDYV achieves a 9.46% return, which is significantly lower than VOE's 10.94% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MDYV having a 10.44% annualized return and VOE not far ahead at 10.57%.


MDYV

1D
1.10%
1M
1.16%
YTD
9.46%
6M
10.77%
1Y
22.70%
3Y*
14.04%
5Y*
7.63%
10Y*
10.44%

VOE

1D
0.88%
1M
0.99%
YTD
10.94%
6M
12.61%
1Y
23.84%
3Y*
16.59%
5Y*
8.54%
10Y*
10.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDYV vs. VOE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MDYV
SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF
9.46%7.45%11.48%15.35%-7.19%30.51%3.68%25.89%-11.95%12.31%
VOE
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF
10.94%12.08%14.00%9.85%-7.97%28.78%2.65%27.85%-12.48%17.07%

Correlation

The correlation between MDYV and VOE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2006

0.86

The correlation between MDYV and VOE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

MDYV vs. VOE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MDYV
VOE

Financial Services

21.8%
16.5%

Industrials

18.8%
14.0%

Consumer Cyclical

13.5%
5.7%

Real Estate

9.6%
6.0%

Technology

9.3%
10.9%

Energy

7.4%
12.8%

Basic Materials

6.0%
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
7.9%

Utilities

4.2%
12.1%

Healthcare

3.5%
6.3%

Communication Services

0.5%
2.2%

Financial Services

MDYV
21.8%
VOE
16.5%

Industrials

MDYV
18.8%
VOE
14.0%

Consumer Cyclical

MDYV
13.5%
VOE
5.7%

Real Estate

MDYV
9.6%
VOE
6.0%

Technology

MDYV
9.3%
VOE
10.9%

Energy

MDYV
7.4%
VOE
12.8%

Basic Materials

MDYV
6.0%
VOE
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

MDYV
5.5%
VOE
7.9%

Utilities

MDYV
4.2%
VOE
12.1%

Healthcare

MDYV
3.5%
VOE
6.3%

Communication Services

MDYV
0.5%
VOE
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDYV vs. VOE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDYV
MDYV Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
MDYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDYV Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
MDYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDYV Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

VOE
VOE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
VOE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOE Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
VOE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOE Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDYV vs. VOE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MDYVVOEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.50

2.09

-0.59

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.25

3.00

-0.76

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.36

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.11

3.44

-1.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.26

13.06

-5.80

MDYV vs. VOE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDYV Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the VOE Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDYV and VOE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MDYVVOEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

2.09

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.54

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.56

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.44

-0.03

Drawdowns

MDYV vs. VOE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDYV drawdown since its inception was -60.71%, roughly equal to the maximum VOE drawdown of -61.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDYV and VOE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDYVVOEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.71%

-61.50%

+0.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.53%

-6.93%

-3.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.58%

-18.45%

-4.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.58%

-19.70%

-2.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.90%

-43.18%

-2.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.62%

-8.35%

-0.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

1.82%

+1.24%

Volatility

MDYV vs. VOE - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV) has a higher volatility of 4.05% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) at 2.64%. This indicates that MDYV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDYVVOEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.05%

2.64%

+1.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.56%

8.16%

+2.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.25%

11.46%

+3.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.50%

16.03%

+3.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.90%

18.83%

+3.07%

MDYV vs. VOE - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDYV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VOE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MDYV vs. VOE - Dividend Comparison

MDYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, less than VOE's 1.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MDYV
SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF
1.72%1.72%1.89%1.59%1.90%1.74%1.69%1.83%2.28%2.48%1.83%4.31%
VOE
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF
1.87%2.10%2.11%2.27%2.27%1.78%2.36%2.05%2.75%1.86%1.92%2.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, MDYV and VOE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MDYV has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to VOE (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDYV dropped -60.71% vs VOE's -61.50%.

On 10-year performance, VOE leads with 10.57% vs 10.44% for MDYV. On fees, VOE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, VOE has been the lower-risk option at 2.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOE has performed better with a 10.57% return vs 10.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for MDYV.

VOE has the higher dividend yield at 1.87%, compared with 1.72% for MDYV.

MDYV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Value Index, while VOE tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MDYV and 0.07% for VOE.

VOE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDYV and VOE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer