MDYV vs. IVOV
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV).
MDYV and IVOV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MDYV is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Value Index. It was launched on Nov 8, 2005. IVOV is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Value Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010. Both MDYV and IVOV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MDYV or IVOV.
Key characteristics
| MDYV | IVOV | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 15.15% | 15.14% |
| 1Y Return | 28.23% | 28.22% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 6.59% | 6.62% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 11.51% | 11.51% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 9.59% | 9.59% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.79 | 1.79 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.56 | 2.57 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.32 | 1.32 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.66 | 2.65 |
| Martin Ratio | 10.08 | 9.99 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.90% | 2.94% |
| Daily Std Dev | 16.36% | 16.35% |
| Max Drawdown | -60.70% | -45.99% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.34% | -2.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDYV and IVOV is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
MDYV vs. IVOV - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MDYV having a 15.15% return and IVOV slightly lower at 15.14%. Over a longer period, both investments have demonstrated similar performance, with their 10-year annualized returns being quite close: MDYV at 9.59% and IVOV at 9.59%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MDYV vs. IVOV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MDYV and IVOV have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MDYV vs. IVOV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MDYV vs. IVOV - Dividend Comparison
MDYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, more than IVOV's 1.32% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDYV SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF | 1.60% | 1.59% | 1.90% | 1.74% | 1.70% | 1.83% | 2.28% | 2.48% | 1.83% | 4.24% | 4.05% | 1.41% |
IVOV Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF | 1.32% | 1.52% | 1.97% | 1.78% | 2.42% | 1.75% | 1.87% | 1.55% | 1.36% | 1.66% | 1.47% | 0.85% |
Drawdowns
MDYV vs. IVOV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDYV drawdown since its inception was -60.70%, which is greater than IVOV's maximum drawdown of -45.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDYV and IVOV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MDYV vs. IVOV - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) have volatilities of 5.78% and 5.76%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.