MDYV vs. IVOV
MDYV (SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF) and IVOV (Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Value Index, from State Street and Vanguard respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MDYV returned 10.84%/yr vs 10.90%/yr for IVOV. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MDYV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IVOV.
Performance
MDYV vs. IVOV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MDYV having a 11.09% return and IVOV slightly lower at 11.06%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MDYV having a 10.84% annualized return and IVOV not far ahead at 10.90%.
MDYV
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 3.27%
- YTD
- 11.09%
- 6M
- 9.04%
- 1Y
- 22.24%
- 3Y*
- 14.38%
- 5Y*
- 8.68%
- 10Y*
- 10.84%
IVOV
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 3.35%
- YTD
- 11.06%
- 6M
- 9.05%
- 1Y
- 22.35%
- 3Y*
- 14.47%
- 5Y*
- 8.72%
- 10Y*
- 10.90%
MDYV vs. IVOV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDYV SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF | 11.09% | 7.45% | 11.48% | 15.35% | -7.19% | 30.51% | 3.68% | 25.89% | -11.95% | 12.31% |
IVOV Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF | 11.06% | 7.61% | 11.53% | 15.38% | -7.20% | 30.50% | 3.70% | 25.91% | -12.13% | 12.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDYV and IVOV is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010 | 0.93 |
The correlation between MDYV and IVOV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
MDYV vs. IVOV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MDYV
IVOV
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Healthcare
Communication Services
Financial Services
MDYV
IVOV
Industrials
MDYV
IVOV
Consumer Cyclical
MDYV
IVOV
Technology
MDYV
IVOV
Real Estate
MDYV
IVOV
Energy
MDYV
IVOV
Basic Materials
MDYV
IVOV
Consumer Defensive
MDYV
IVOV
Utilities
MDYV
IVOV
Healthcare
MDYV
IVOV
Communication Services
MDYV
IVOV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MDYV vs. IVOV — Risk / Return Rank
MDYV
IVOV
MDYV vs. IVOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MDYV | IVOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.26 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.12 | 2.12 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.31 | 7.31 | 0.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MDYV vs. IVOV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDYV drawdown since its inception was -60.71%, which is greater than IVOV's maximum drawdown of -45.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDYV and IVOV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDYV | IVOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.71% | -45.99% | -14.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.53% | -10.58% | +0.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.58% | -22.61% | +0.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.58% | -22.61% | +0.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.90% | -45.99% | +0.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.81% | -0.81% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.60% | -5.41% | -3.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.05% | 3.06% | -0.01% |
Volatility
MDYV vs. IVOV - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) have volatilities of 3.87% and 3.71%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MDYV | IVOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.87% | 3.71% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.71% | 10.72% | -0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.39% | 15.35% | +0.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.45% | 19.43% | +0.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.91% | 21.74% | +0.17% |
MDYV vs. IVOV - Expense Ratio Comparison
MDYV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than IVOV's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MDYV vs. IVOV - Dividend Comparison
MDYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, more than IVOV's 1.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVOV Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF | 1.64% | 1.82% | 1.74% | 1.52% | 1.97% | 1.78% | 2.42% | 1.75% | 1.87% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.66% |
MDYV SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF | 2.16% | 1.72% | 1.89% | 1.59% | 1.90% | 1.74% | 1.69% | 1.83% | 2.28% | 2.48% | 1.83% | 4.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, MDYV and IVOV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
MDYV has higher volatility (3.87%) compared to IVOV (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDYV dropped -60.71% vs IVOV's -45.99%.
On 10-year performance, IVOV leads with 10.90% vs 10.84% for MDYV. On fees, IVOV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IVOV has been the lower-risk option at 3.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IVOV has performed better with a 10.90% return vs 10.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVOV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for MDYV.
MDYV has the higher dividend yield at 2.16%, compared with 1.64% for IVOV.
Both ETFs track S&P MidCap 400 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MDYV and 0.10% for IVOV.
IVOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MDYV and IVOV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer