PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDYV vs. IVOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDYV vs. IVOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MDYV having a 13.25% return and IVOV slightly lower at 13.17%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MDYV having a 10.59% annualized return and IVOV not far ahead at 10.61%.


MDYV

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.75%
6M
8.78%
YTD
13.25%
1Y
22.67%
3Y*
11.89%
5Y*
9.11%
10Y*
10.59%
ALL TIME*
9.10%

IVOV

1D
-0.27%
1M
0.84%
6M
8.73%
YTD
13.17%
1Y
22.84%
3Y*
11.95%
5Y*
9.15%
10Y*
10.61%
ALL TIME*
11.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$975.54K$1.11M$1.64M
$12.18M$9.03M$7.86M

MDYV vs. IVOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MDYV
SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF
13.25%7.45%11.48%15.35%-7.19%30.51%3.68%25.89%-11.95%12.31%
IVOV
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
13.17%7.61%11.53%15.38%-7.20%30.50%3.70%25.91%-12.13%12.22%

Correlation

The correlation between MDYV and IVOV is 1.00 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.93

The correlation between MDYV and IVOV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

MDYV vs. IVOV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MDYV
IVOV

Financial Services

22.2%
21.8%

Industrials

16.3%
19.2%

Consumer Cyclical

13.6%
13.9%

Real Estate

9.8%
9.5%

Technology

9.5%
10.3%

Basic Materials

7.5%
5.7%

Energy

6.7%
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
4.8%

Healthcare

4.6%
3.8%

Utilities

4.0%
4.0%

Communication Services

0.8%
0.8%

Financial Services

MDYV
22.2%
IVOV
21.8%

Industrials

MDYV
16.3%
IVOV
19.2%

Consumer Cyclical

MDYV
13.6%
IVOV
13.9%

Real Estate

MDYV
9.8%
IVOV
9.5%

Technology

MDYV
9.5%
IVOV
10.3%

Basic Materials

MDYV
7.5%
IVOV
5.7%

Energy

MDYV
6.7%
IVOV
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

MDYV
5.0%
IVOV
4.8%

Healthcare

MDYV
4.6%
IVOV
3.8%

Utilities

MDYV
4.0%
IVOV
4.0%

Communication Services

MDYV
0.8%
IVOV
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDYV vs. IVOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MDYV
MDYV Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
MDYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDYV Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
MDYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDYV Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

IVOV
IVOV Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
IVOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVOV Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
IVOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVOV Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MDYV vs. IVOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MDYVIVOVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.25

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

1.98

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.98

7.05

-0.07

MDYV vs. IVOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDYV Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the IVOV Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDYV and IVOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MDYV vs. IVOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDYV drawdown since its inception was -60.71%, which is greater than IVOV's maximum drawdown of -45.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDYV and IVOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDYVIVOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.71%

-45.99%

-14.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.53%

-10.58%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.58%

-22.61%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.58%

-22.61%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.90%

-45.99%

+0.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.24%

-1.21%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.56%

-5.38%

-3.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

2.97%

-0.01%

Volatility

MDYV vs. IVOV - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) have volatilities of 3.39% and 3.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDYVIVOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.39%

3.31%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.36%

10.36%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.00%

14.98%

+0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.29%

19.26%

+0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.83%

21.65%

+0.18%

MDYV vs. IVOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDYV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than IVOV's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MDYV vs. IVOV - Dividend Comparison

MDYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, more than IVOV's 1.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVOV
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
1.61%1.82%1.74%1.52%1.97%1.78%2.42%1.75%1.87%1.55%1.51%1.66%
MDYV
SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF
1.67%1.72%1.89%1.59%1.90%1.74%1.69%1.83%2.28%2.48%1.83%4.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, MDYV and IVOV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MDYV has higher volatility (3.39%) compared to IVOV (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDYV dropped -60.71% vs IVOV's -45.99%.

On 10-year performance, IVOV leads with 10.61% vs 10.59% for MDYV. On fees, IVOV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IVOV has performed better with a 10.61% return vs 10.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVOV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for MDYV.

MDYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 1.61% for IVOV.

Both ETFs track S&P MidCap 400 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MDYV and 0.10% for IVOV.

IVOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDYV and IVOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer